Wallflower wrote: » The baldy head is on again now on RTE making yet another hames about his relationship with Fianna Fail :D. Has he not been briefed to get this straight:eek:
raymon wrote: » My point was not that I had a desire to debate your personal politics and specific views
My point was more that I believe that FF ruined the country and you don't, and that we might stifle the op , so I was suggesting that another thread would be more suitable
Wallflower wrote: » Would you ever stop deliberating missing the point? I couldn't give a toss if he was the leader of FF for 50 years, nothing wrong with that. I've even voted FF on numerous occasions and have nothing against the organisation as such (notwithstanding their performance in the last two governments). The issue is the LYING in this case. The original point of this thread. The answer is YES he did lie. In terms of the state grant, the issue is not the details - and well you know it - the issue is why such a trouble over such a relatively small amount of money.
Wallflower wrote: » Would you ever stop deliberating missing the point?
KELTICKNIGHTT wrote: » read it again says what you need to know other wise show proof if different ?
raymon wrote: » Point out the line or lines that exonerated him in his statement Words , waffle, spin and more spin Nothing to see here
KELTICKNIGHTT wrote: » so you don;t have proof then
raymon wrote: » He said he was not involved in FF since 2009 , this is a lie I knew it was a lie so it outraged me when he repeatedly lied in many interviews
irishdude11 wrote: » I couldnt even be bothered arguing with the pro-Gallagher faction in this thread anymore. He has been well and truly found out now. His reputation is going down the tubes, just like his business - you know, the one that was only profitable for about 3 or 4 years because of a massive property bubble. He is a failed businessman FFer trying to spoof his way into the Presidency and he has been found out. His last few appearances on TV/radio speak for themselves, the general public know the score and its game over for FF and Sean Gallagher now, the ruse has failed - just like his business. He made a big mistake even running for the Presidency because now he has been completely exposed as a FFer with a mediocre track record in business his professional spoofing gig, giving speeches on how to create successful businesses when he couldnt even manage that himself, is finished. Maybe we might see Gallagher appearing on the Dragon's Den in the near future as the guy looking for funding as opposed to the Dragon. Although I dont see any of the other Dragon's giving him any money now that everyone knows he has a useless track record in business and ended up in court over a 20K debt that he settled for 19K - LMFAO!!
KELTICKNIGHTT wrote: » did you see interview on 6:01 news on rte with s gallagher
raymon wrote: » Didnt see it . Did he tell lies again or avoid the question. I will catch it on the Rte player later
patwicklow wrote: » Of course hes telling lies hes a former FF supporter and a millionaire can you not put two and two together!
irishdude11 wrote: » I couldnt even be bothered arguing with the pro-Gallagher faction in this thread anymore.
KELTICKNIGHTT wrote: » so if anyone supports ff ,they guilty ,even the guy on the street who supports ff ?
patwicklow wrote: » He was more then a supporter, But answer is yes who in there right mind would. with the mess they left behind.
CDfm wrote: » I do not know if its nesscessary to be a supporter of FF to be guilty you have to be Anti FF and SG to be exonerated.
KELTICKNIGHTT wrote: » look at it and see what you think
CDfm wrote: » Its not a pro Gallagher faction on the thread but a Neutral Faction questioning the Anti SG Faction There is a huge difference.
toexpress wrote: » Now I'm not one to judge but if someone I knew to be a member of Fianna Fail even just briefly back say in 1934 told me the sky was blue I would go and check just to be sure
jonniebgood1 wrote: » That is a very sweeping way of judging people. I prefer to judge people on what they say as an individual rather than single them out for an association that they have had in the past.
toexpress wrote: » yeah lay with dogs and you're going to catch fleas. At the end of the day would you give a job to someone you knew had been involved with the Westies? Would you heck as like so why give a job to someone you know to have been involved with the Soldiers of Fortune or as they like to be known the Soldiers of Destiny
raymon wrote: » I'm not anti Sean Gallagher . I am against his lies and dishonesty.
CDfm wrote: » I hope you don't mind me asking , and dont feel you have tp answer, but have you ever voted for a FF candidate in any election.( includes 1st Preference and transfers) .
