-Corkie- wrote: » They are decent but I couldnt see myself buying one again. For example I have the very same steering wheel and stereo as my mates Caddy van..:rolleyes:
VolvoMan wrote: » That said, I'm not denying the Passat is a decent car in its own right.
-Corkie- wrote: » Definitley does pisx all over the Passat. Thats a seriously cheap car given the spec etc. I bought a brand new Passat in 07 with a few extras and only a good weekend away with the change out of 36k
VolvoMan wrote: » +1 Excellent car. Pisses all over the Passat. It's just the general Irish public are too stupid to know.
R.O.R wrote: » 2.0T S lists at €41,400. Sport at €42,400 and SE at €44,400. Full leather was an option on the Sport, but I don't know how much.
Limerick man wrote: » €42,400 plus delivery plus metallic I'm assuming?
bittihuduga wrote: » is it a mondeo engine inside S60?
Limerick man wrote: » €42,400 plus delivery plus metallic I'm assuming? A bit shy of 10k under valued there Mr. Volvoman. I've a few of those Guides too, but I the earliest would also be 07.
R.O.R wrote: » Some clever person in here decided to throw away all the Car Sales Guides from before 2007 (had most months going back to 98 :mad:) so earliest I can find was Feb 07. 2.0T S lists at €41,400. Sport at €42,400 and SE at €44,400. Full leather was an option on the Sport, but I don't know how much. If that S60 checks out, that's savage value. If it weren't for the fuel consumption, I'd be tempted myself (even though I really don't like the look of the spaceball gear knob).
Limerick man wrote: » That was 35k new? Even with the leather etc.? Jesus... Not bad value, pity it was a really old design in 06. Still looking lovely now, though.
VolvoMan wrote: » They were indeed. Sure I remember it was one of the reasons my father backed out of buying an 18 month old T5; it was priced more than a brand new 2.0T. People probably remember that up until quite recently, SE spec in Volvo's got you leather and everything for a minimum outlay. It was a major selling point.
166man wrote: » If that car was infact 35k new then may I reiterate my original post and say that it looks like excellent value for money and yes I second the 'pisses on a passat' statement..:D
VolvoMan wrote: » It was 35k new and is smaller than a Passat in overall length (after checking there very quickly, it is in fact over 100mm shorter). I think you're thinking this is an S80.
bittihuduga wrote: » thats very cheap for that mileage. how can i know if the mileage is genuine and not clocked?
Limerick man wrote: » Of course it pisses all over the Passat, it's a much bigger, turbo'd version that cost alot more and is now worth even less than an equivalent Passat!
166man wrote: » This is a bit left field and the tax might be a bit high but a fine car nonethelesshttp://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/cars/2535131
bittihuduga wrote: » thanks for the views 166man. the problem is all those mondeos/passats are pricey :-( its difficult to find a low mileage car within the budget
bittihuduga wrote: » is this any good compared to the above?http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/cars/2207256
bittihuduga wrote: » what are your thoughts on the below? anything to look out for?http://www.carzone.ie/search/Volkswagen/Passat/PASSAT-B/201135204252519/advert?channel=CARShttp://www.carzone.ie/search/Volkswagen/Passat/1.4-TSI-/131159952887249/advert?channel=CARS
bittihuduga wrote: » if you don't mind, can you please share some suggestions?