books4sale wrote: » Goalscoringdude... It remains to be seen what 'Ironman' will do for business. ......it's no case closed, cash registers ringing for everyone, that's an everyman's opinion and easily roared from rooftops.
DeepSleeper wrote: » I still maintain they picked the wrong route for the cycle - you can say it isn't a curfew if you like, but thousands of households will either be confined inside their own front gate (if they live on the N59) or will be confined to their own side road with no route out (if they live anywhere off the N59) for seven hours!!!! The N59 is almost unique in Galway in having a large lake to one side and a range of low hills on the other - only a couple of roads cross these hills towards to coast, and they are also closing one of those. If the race was held elsewhere (in east Galway for example), people would usually have an option to ''go the other way" - negotiate a series of backroads and 'get out' to another main route that isn't closed - Most people living on or just off the N59 corridor don't have this option unless they want to get in a boat or hike over a hill.... So - other options? Well, we're looking for a good quality road that can be closed with minimal interference to the local population....Ideally one that doesn't have loads of people living on it, that doesn't have loads of small roads opening on to it which each will require stewards, one which has a very good alternative route available (not like the boreen over Shannapheasteen mountain that Oughterard - Galway traffic is expected to use...)... It's called the M6 people!! Close the eastbound lanes from Galway to Loughrea, keeping the westbound traffic flowing as normal. Run eastbound traffic along the old N6 through Craughwell and let them rejoin the motorway at Loughrea. Run the cyclists out-and-back on the eastbound carriageway. No properties are accessed directly from the motorway, so no people are confined to their homes. Only a handfull of motorway on-ramps need to be closed, so less than 20 stewards/gardaí could control it - no need to close dozens of local roads with thousands of houses on them. The surface is good, so no need for last-minute rush-job road surfacing like we've seen on the N59 lately. The alternative route is wide, fast and safe (it's the old Dublin-Galway road) and well able to cope with Sunday-morning traffic loads. Have your bike/run transition in Ballybrit racecourse if you like and then let the runners run back across the city to the finish in Salthill... I should be getting paid as a consultant for this!!!:rolleyes:
Head The Wall wrote: » Have you ever cycled on a motorway? It'd be more exciting racing to line up all the cyclists on turbo trainers and let them do the 90k that way. Sending them out connamara will also showcase the scenery out there and by having an out and back course they will need half the number of stewards than a loop course.
DeepSleeper wrote: » Ah, so it is OK to restrict a few thousand households inside their front gates for 7 hours on the basis that cycling the N59 is more interesting? Right.... And anyway, what loop course are you talking about? Read the post...
tphase wrote: » Does it really matter if it was on a motorway? A race is a race is a race. Can't be any less exciting than on a track and hardly worth closing part of a national primary route, with no alternative, for 7 hours just in case someone takes their nose off the handlebars to look at the scenery (the best of which is further west and north-west of the route and gets well showcased anyway)
Head The Wall wrote: » Look it's happening, these people would have had a chance to object to the closure if it was that much of an issue for them. As has been posted here these things happen the world over. Maybe it's just that Ireland has more complainers than other countries. Are you one of these "thousands" of households restricted by the road closure tomorrow or are you just a having a moan? From your post I can take it that you have never raced a bike on a DC or motorway so you don't know what you are on about. It makes a huge difference and I'll leave it at that and I'm speaking from experience here. I'll agree that there are nicer parts of the connamara they could have used but I'm sure there are lots of other factors that helped them decide on the route
tphase wrote: » From your post, I take it you are not one of the thousands of affected households. There was no prior consultation or opportunity to object as far as I'm aware. Maybe I missed that flyer in my letterbox ... Perhaps you'd do us the courtesy of explaining this "huge difference" rather than being patronising and dismissive of people who have a perfectly legitimate complaint
Head The Wall wrote: » Look it's happening, these people would have had a chance to object to the closure if it was that much of an issue for them. As has been posted here these things happen the world over. Maybe it's just that Ireland has more complainers than other countries. Are you one of these "thousands" of households restricted by the road closure tomorrow or are you just a having a moan?
ratracer wrote: » I completed this race today, in what have to be some of the toughtest conditions i've ever raced in, and no i'm not a professional athlete, i'll be back at work in the morning. Many thanks to all the supporters and marshalls along the bike route, they shortened the journey and gave all the athletes a great welcome. In that weather today, were that many people planning to use the roads this morning, I doubt it. They were open again by 2pm, perhaps even earlier if the last cyclist had gone through. The race was a great success, i hope it goes from strength to strength. I for one will raise some small concerns with the organisers so they can improve for next rae, i sincerely hope the anonymous people posting here do the same. The race isn't meant to intrude on peoples daily lives, but it's one day a year, and the route has to go somewhere, so their will always be NIMBY's complaining.
Me again! wrote: » Considering it was supposed to be watched by millions all over the world and it was so high profile why wasnt it on RTE? In fact i didnt even hear it mentioned on RTE today on TV or Radio. There was a piece about it on the RTE six o clock news this evening.
DeepSleeper wrote: » 'These people' didn't really have a chance to object - the proposed road closure was sanctioned months ago and most residents only heard about it in recent weeks (by flyer and electronic signage) after the plan had become a fait accompli and objections were no longer possible. Since you put a word I used a few times [thousands] in quotation marks, I assume you are trying to cast doubt on the accuracy of the term without actually calling me out on it - the five DEDs through which the route passes from Oughterard to Moycullen contain over 6100 residents (others, not included in this figure, live on the N59 to the west and east of this core area). The vast majority of these people have no means of getting out of this area without using the N59. Yes, I do live in the area and, yes, I must use the N59 to access anywhere other than the little cul de sac I live on so, yes, the road closures had a severe impact on my plans for the weekend. Portraying people who have a genuine complaint about the road closures as moaners doesn't strengthen your argument one bit...
Head The Wall wrote: » All road closure notices are posted in the papers by the relevant council, the same as planning and liquor license applications. People then have a chance to object to the council.
Try cycling on a flat wide open undulating road with no end or marker in sight. Motorways originally used to be completely straight and flat until people started dozing off and crashing. Cycling on one is the very same, it feels like it will never end and is usually why there are no races on them. A 56 mile cycle is tough enough and having it on smaller type roads keeps the mind focused and makes it pass faster
It's also illegal to cycle on a motorway
ratace wrote: » In that weather today, were that many people planning to use the roads this morning, I doubt it.
Caribs wrote: » I spoke to a member of the Gardai around 1200 yesterday just after the last cyclist had gone through the village and asked him if they'd be opening the road on a rolling basis now that the cycling had finished. He rolled his eyes and said that that would have made sense but that it wasn't approved so they couldn't. I think had that been an option there probably would have been far less outcry.
....and as for the OP and the Hotel losing €20k - I think there may be a slight exaggeration there.
pepe00 wrote: » for me that hotel made a bad publicity, but no matter what they say, but they say...
ratracer wrote: » IMO using the church as a reason to disrupt anything in Ireland counts for nothing anymore.
ratracer wrote: » I'm pretty sure there was a Saturday night mass that people could have gone to if they really wanted too. IMO using the church as a reason to disrupt anything in Ireland counts for nothing anymore.
scholar007 wrote: » OUGHTERARD HOTEL THREATENS TO CLOSE DURING IRON MAN EVENT August 30, 2011 - 1:20pm - GalwayNews.ie OUGHTERARD HOTEL THREATENS TO CLOSE DURING IRON MAN EVENT Management at an Oughterard hotel are claiming they may be forced to close during this weekend's Iron Man event. The Connemara Gateway Hotel is situated on the N59 road which will be partially closed from 7am to 2pm next Sunday to facilitate race participants. The hotel estimates it will lose in the region of €20,000 in revenue due to cancellations from tour operators. Seems not all boats are being lifted!