ab04 wrote: » apologies realised i didnt answer your question. having looked at it again, i've no idea where the 79K came from. every other year it goes up by 8%, but in that year it goes up by more. Sorry!
luco123 wrote: » Thanks ab04, One quick thing though, how do they then get the €79,234 for year 2?
ab04 wrote: » The 61972 is the 154932*40%, which is the increase in obc's profits. then goes up by 8% each year after.
luco123 wrote: » Thanks ab04, One quick thing though, how do they then get the €61,972?
lucky01 wrote: » This might help? IAS 37 para 92. "disclosure of some or all of the information can be expected to prejudice seriously the position of the entity in a dispute with other parties. In such cases an entity need not disclose the information, but shall disclose the general nature of the dispute.....and reason why the information has not been disclosed"
ab04 wrote: » yeah took me a while to figure that one out myself... look at appendix 2, the profit for the farm in 09 is 154,932. take 40% of that for the profit increase. hope that helps
Wrecked007 wrote: » in the reading time of the exam, can we write on paper we bring in, or is just on the exam paper we can write?
ohgodd wrote: » In relation to audit reports is it okay if the client leaves out a threat of litigation on the grounds that disclosure will prejudice the outcome of the case? I have a recollection of this being said in a case or a lecture but i've gone through all the report qs and can't seem to find it anywhere. Does anyone know where to point in material for this? Wrecking my head(along with everthing else)so any help much appreciated!
luco123 wrote: » Hi Is deferred tax on investment properties calculated using the CGT rate?
acahopeful wrote: » Hi, do you have a soft copy of this question and solution or could you let me know where i could find it please? Thanks
the_big_dawg wrote: » Does this mean Rickyroma is an insider and has been spying on us? The institute are wonderful, Ricky! Ha ha, I'm losing my mind!
Rickyroma wrote: » The email has been forwarded by the CAI a week early - it was supposed to be sent next Friday and feedback is to be given AFTER the exams. FFS - this will be a complete waste of a day while I contact them and get this fixed. In the meantime PLEASE DON'T complete the survey - it is supposed to be post exams feedback. Thanks
okdune wrote: » Have you done the Flexum question - try that at least it gives you a layout to follow should it come up. Although it says in the solutions that the sentences with * are the key sentences they are looking for - I claerly would have failed it. Wayyy too specific.
Sofa King Great wrote: » Just came on to post the same. Glad to see they really have our interests at heart. similar to the institutes survey a few weeks ago!!
Student456 wrote: » I haven't even thought of a pricing question! I looked at the price section alright in marketing thats about it!! It better not come up!! What you done for it?