lisa39 wrote: » Here you go....
daddydick wrote: » Can somebody post up last years AAA mock paper please, would be much appreciated?
ABCxyz 123 wrote: » On Motorvation Case how come sale of motor vehicles is not a qualifying trade for purposes of BES relief? What trades are qualifying trades? Tax manual just says must be a trading company (manufacturing but not exclusively)
Vaioer wrote: » On that question of BES, do we still answer question on the basis of BES being valid, even though it has been replaced by EII relief?
Nidot wrote: » All taxation is based on the 2010 Finance act for which BES is still valid.
Nidot wrote: » My interpretation is BES is available to al trades which are involved in the creation of economic value not those involved in the retail of products or services, dats how i judge em. Basic rule is any business not involved in retail of service or product qualifies for BES.
ahtfulal wrote: » Would anyone have a good index summary of Derry Cotter case study book? Would be helpful to have something showing key wording etc. from each case without going into too much detail.
Nom-IzZ wrote: » its been asked a few times by different peeps but no one seems to have the answer......... anyone have a copy of the 2011 Mock Audit Elective solution. Thanks
1306 wrote: » Anyone else feeling completely unprepared for this even though iv looked at all the cases?? I'm a repeat and have major fears of failing again!!
tt0717 wrote: » Feeling the same here too, it seems that I have forgotten everything that I have studied, have basically studied, forgot and re-read! Honestly de-motivated and don't know whats a week more of this crap will help me passing at all :(:(
netpia11 wrote: » tt0717 wrote: » Feeling the same here too, it seems that I have forgotten everything that I have studied, have basically studied, forgot and re-read! Honestly de-motivated and don't know whats a week more of this crap will help me passing at all :(:( Feel the same also....at this stage im bored but still feel like i have a lot to learn but no interest to do it... seriously think it comes down to your performance on the day and how you read the case... planning on spending an hour at least planning my answer
kitten_k wrote: » I am looking at the Regulations, Guidance & Standards Examinable section of the Competency Statement and it appear that the only material in the Student Technical Handbook is:Pronouncements of the Urgent Issues Task Force D D40Miscellaneous Technical Statements M9APB Bulletins 2006/1 2009/02 Is this correct? Doesn't seem much considering the amount of material in the book.
LightningBolt wrote: » Are you doing the audit elective? If not that may be fine but if you are there's another 3 or so bulletins along with M21, M39, M41/2 (depending on jurisdiction) and M46 I think.
ManwitaPlan wrote: » As far as I know its perfectly fine to give management recommendations on how to improve their controls. Management letters with observation/implication/recommendation crops up a lot. Its not a "non-audit service" its general advice to a client on how to improve the audit process. Sorry that I cannot point to something technical off the top off my head but I am 99.9% sure this is ok...hold my hands up if anybody knows better. PS: Thanks Christ I am not doing CAP 2 exams because I am certain I would fail on consol....what an absolute whore god of a topic.:eek: