Solnskaya wrote: » off topic(whats new)but i've always believed that people should be allowed to do as much hunting as they like, using their bare hands. That would even things up a bit. Anything beyond a big stick(and even that's cheating)should be illegal.
mattjack wrote: » I thought they were all trained to use fire arms..
Blay wrote: » A lot of hunters uses moderators to control the sound of their rifle
Solnskaya wrote: » off topic(whats new)but i've always believed that people should be allowed to do as much hunting as they like, using their bare hands. That would even things up a bit. Anything beyond a big stick(and even that's cheating)should be illegal. FFS, if you want fish or venison, tesco have it in the frozen aisle. I'm an ex-hunter btw, but I still have a huge gun Audrey.
Norwayviking wrote: » I hope you dont plan on hunting aliigators:rolleyes:
Icyseanfitz wrote: » as for animals lingering from a modern hunting bow or crossbow, fat chance those things pack some punch would be equal to a gun considering the range it would have to be used from
Solnskaya wrote: » it's way more fun with bare hands, the alligator even gets to win sometimes. "Alligator hunting with bare hands" would be a top rated show tbh, it could also be a punishment for those delinquent kids, "go gettum Connor".
harmoniums wrote: » I carry a pistol daily, concealed and lawfully. Knackers, imagine the possibilities!
LC2010HIS wrote: » I wish I never mentioned hunting now :rolleyes::D
Blay wrote: » You'd be suprised, if a deer for example can take a shot from something like a .308 round or above and survive for even 30 seconds, I'd seriously doubt whether a bow could be depended on to give a clean kill. That's not to say it can't be done but it wouldn't be as consistent as a rifle.
ForegoneReality wrote: » . On a similar topic I've also noticed that, when in Georgia, New York and Wisconsin; that the presence of Police was much higher than it is here. .
Norwayviking wrote: » The new modern crossbows and compound bows has a serious knock down power,if you hit what you aim for. They are well capable of killing an an animal just like a rifle. The problem is that you have to do it close up. With a rifle you can extend the range,and still make a clean humane kill.
LC2010HIS wrote: » I think big gardai numbers in the country would enforce respect? Or at least cop on... ... ..
mattjack wrote: » yep..I know whatcha mean..since they did away with the height requirment all we got now is little gardai numbers...
LC2010HIS wrote: » Jesus christ like....:D
LC2010HIS wrote: » I'm 6".. female like:D
Solnskaya wrote: » Personally, I've a firearms licence(so I can't be a complete nutter, apparently), and I like having a gun. It's a nice fall back. So maybe the cops here should be armed, if only because all the health and safety/training courses they would have to attend would mean they had less time available to hassle me about car tax and tyres etc.
Chuck Stone wrote: » If the police carry guns then I want to be able to own one. Fair's fair.
Norwayviking wrote: » well i think we will leave him out of it for now;)
harmoniums wrote: » Why cant you? do you have a criminal record? if not, apply, pistol wise your limited to a .22. Rifle wise a 22 semi auto or a bolt action centerfire. If you want a semi auto rifle, you'll need a monitored (like phonewatch or soemthing) safe
Blay wrote: » You can own one.
mattjack wrote: » ohhhh I cant help myself.....you,re like a female..? a transgender garda ?
Chuck Stone wrote: » I have no criminal record. Am I allowed to own a hand gun?