Fad wrote: » I've always thought of fantasy as a bit naff, but in reality, I've never given it much of a chance.
Duffy the Vampire Slayer wrote: » On the subject of recommendations, does anyone have any detective novels they found to be good?
Fad wrote: » C&H seems to have a fairly large chunk of fantasy fans.... I've always thought of fantasy as a bit naff, but in reality, I've never given it much of a chance, A Song of Ice and Fire seems to be incredibly popular, any other recommendations?
Jackobyte wrote: » James Patterson's Alex Cross series were good but the recent ones have gone too farfetched(Cross Country is just stupid).
Duffy the Vampire Slayer wrote: » I'm not really fussed on old or modern, anything with a gripping plot will suit me. Is Alex Cross the fella Morgan Freeman played in those two films?
Fad wrote: » C&H seems to have a fairly large chunk of fantasy fans.... I've always thought of fantasy as a bit naff, but in reality, I've never given it much of a chance, A Song of Ice and Fire seems to be incredibly popular, any other recommendations? I'm planning on reading Infinite Jest at some point in the near future, so something that's not horrifically dense, relatively easy reading that's still quite engaging?
The Continental Op first heard Personville called Poisonville by Hickey Dewey. But since Dewey also called a shirt a shoit, he didn't think anything of it. Until he went there and his client, the only honest man in Poisonville, was murdered. Then the Op decided to stay to punish the guilty. And that meant taking on the entire town...
whiteman19 wrote: » The Dark Tower series is probably the best fantasy series i've read to date. first book is a bit tough to get into if you've never read Stephen King before, but once you start the second, it's just gripping. 7 books in all, and has a few graphic novels published as well.
Lawliet wrote: » I actually tell people to avoid the Dark Tower. I guess it had some good moments early on but for me none of them made up for the amount of bullshi t.The story meandered around far too much with an insane amount of pointless sub plots, it's not a fantasy epic so much as a dumping ground for random ideas that didn't deserve a book of their own. Also I never forgave Stephen King for that epic waste of time Wizard and Glass.
whiteman19 wrote: » :eek::eek::eek::eek: BLASPHEMY!!! Wizard and Glass was my favourite of the lot tbh. i know not everyone has to like it, but it's all about the journey, and how the characters develop, that's what i loved about it. the last 3 were a bit rushed and some of it did get a bit far fetched, but i still loved the series overall
have you read much of King's other stuff?
Lawliet wrote: » The character development was interesting, I guess, but honestly I stopped caring about them long before the end. I read one other book before, but the Dark Tower just didn't encourage me to look into more of his stuff.
Deleted User wrote: » All of Craig Russel's books. Really dark, gruesome detective series with a pretty original setting. Garth Nix's Sabriel, Lirael and Abhorsen maybe. The Wheel of Time is engaging for the first two books. After that it gets steadily more dense until it becomes nearly unbearable. Raymond Feist's stuff is pretty light going too, or Trudi Canavan.
Deleted User wrote: » Garth Nix's Sabriel, Lirael and Abhorsen maybe. The Wheel of Time is engaging for the first two books. After that it gets steadily more dense until it becomes nearly unbearable. Raymond Feist's stuff is pretty light going too, or Trudi Canavan.
Fad wrote: » Have read the first two actually, years and years ago, first was good, second not so much
eVeNtInE wrote: » This post has been deleted.
whiteman19 wrote: » King's writing isn't to everyone's liking. some of his books are a chore to get through in fairness. The Talisman was a bore for me, bought the sequel Black House before i had read the Talisman, it'll be a while before i'll bother to read it. if you fancy going back to King anytime, start with The Stand. it's a big lump of a book, but like the DT it's all about the journey, not the ending.
Deleted User wrote: » Don't bother with the 3rd then. It's much like the second.
KnifeWRENCH wrote: » Have only read one chapter so far and already having the same problem with Du Sautoy that I did with Goldacre and Dawkins as regards arrogance. Only within the first chapter he's said that whoever solves the Riemann hypothesis would be remembered "long after Edmund Hillary and William Shakespeare are forgotten" or something to that effect. Like I'm a pure science/maths fanboy nerd but this "my discipline is superior to your discipline" bugs the shít out of me. I'm gonna keep reading but I hope he sticks to facts rather than throwing in those stupid kind of comments.
KnifeWRENCH wrote: » Read this recently: Brilliant book that I'd recommend everyone read. The author is a bit arrogant (and is a typical "humanities degree? LOL" academic snob) but other than that minor gripe it's an excellent read. More often than not, his acerbic comments are hilarious. Now onto this: Have only read one chapter so far and already having the same problem with Du Sautoy that I did with Goldacre and Dawkins as regards arrogance. Only within the first chapter he's said that whoever solves the Riemann hypothesis would be remembered "long after Edmund Hillary and William Shakespeare are forgotten" or something to that effect. Like I'm a pure science/maths fanboy nerd but this "my discipline is superior to your discipline" bugs the shít out of me. I'm gonna keep reading but I hope he sticks to facts rather than throwing in those stupid kind of comments.
Deleted User wrote: » Have you read Dr. Riemann's Zeroes? Covers much more than Du Sautoy and the author, Karl Sabbagh, is a much better writer. Also, he's not a mathematician so he doesn't have that vein of snobbery.
KnifeWRENCH wrote: » I haven't. But thank you for the recommendation. Riemann's hypothesis was only mentioned very briefly in college so I actually know very little about it.