Iwannahurl wrote: » Funnily enough, I was just musing on this very point recently. Question: there used to be mills on the river; why did they not destroy the salmon? The river was teeming with salmon when I were a lad. I don't think it was electricity generation that reduced their numbers...
Iwannahurl wrote: » Question: there used to be mills on the river; why did they not destroy the salmon?
Zzippy wrote: » I've seen the damage turbine blades can do to fish and it's not pretty...
Zzippy wrote: » There were mills on the canals, not the main river. Hydro turbines would not be feasible on the weir as they would interfere with salmon (and other species) migration. Hydro power is not the environmentally-friendly alternative some people think, it has destroyed salmon runs on the Shannon, Erne, Lee and Liffey, 4 of Ireland's largest rivers and formerly prolific salmon fisheries. Small scale hydro also has serious impacts on fish passage at weirs. I've seen the damage turbine blades can do to fish and it's not pretty...
Iwannahurl wrote: » I seem to recall that there was some infrastructural work done on a weir or something a few years ago which had to be redesigned when it was discovered that the salmon were not able to get past it. Ring any bells?
Robbo wrote: » There was a weir in Kilkenny which was causing a major problem a couple of years ago, are you thinking of that one?
Sniipe wrote: » I'm all for saving the fish - but could they not have a filtering system before the hydro turbines? Water goes through but fish don't. Perhaps its a silly question...?
Zzippy wrote: » ... So they might be protected from turbine blades but the end result is the same...