NekkidBibleMan wrote: » I'd tell my kids that I don't know, because it's the truth. I'd tell them what I believe (that there's no afterlife), but also that other people think there is (heaven, hell, valhalla...).
Dades wrote: » That sounds best to me - I'll probably go down that route when the time comes. I'd also clarify that those people who claim to know - don't really know either - so don't believe what somebody says because they claim it's true. It's okay to not know.
DoubleBogey wrote: » I take comfort when I feel the wind in my face or the smell of rain, thinking that my deceased love ones are now part of the journey of the universe.
Kooli wrote: » To be honest, I don't even understand what you mean by being part of 'the journey of the universe', so I can't imagine a child getting what that actually means.
DoubleBogey wrote: » ...I take comfort when I feel the wind in my face or the smell of rain, thinking that my deceased love ones are now part of the journey of the universe. I think a child can understand that. They may still think of the person as a sentient being, that maybe they are alive in the wind and rain. But I think that's ok until they are old enough to fully understand.
CerebralCortex wrote: » Tell them the truth.
the culture of deference wrote: » Tell them the truth.
AhSureTisGrand wrote: »
dead one wrote: » "Bigotry tries to keep truth safe in its hand with a grip that kills it."
lynski wrote: » they think the local church is a castle.
lynski wrote: » I am not sure the 4 yr old understands any more then the 2 yr old or vice versa
robindch wrote: » My kid's four and a half and still mistakes churches for castles too :)I explained it all around my kid's fourth birthday -- it came up naturally in conversation one day, so I explained about it all in simple terms and she was cool with it. Last week, we went in to pay our respects to Garret FitzG and while she was quite curious about why he wasn't moving, she wasn't scared or upset about it. Back out on the street as she was climbing back onto the bike, she stopped, turned around to me and said that he'd be put into the ground in a box and that flowers and trees would grow from him and that people could use these to help remember him. It was a nice moment. Based upon my experience of one, it seems to be quite easy for kids not to be scared of death, once it's presented in a calm and non-superstitious way.
AhSureTisGrand wrote: » What are ya schmokin boyo?
lynski wrote: » This is a relevant thread for my family as I have recently buried my father. My 3 are small (4.5, 2.5 and 3mths) so explaining anything to them is limited. They have no exposure whatsoever to religion; they think the local church is a castle. They have no concept of gods, heaven, hell, afterlife, etc. To them grandad is dead, he is buried in the graveyard across from his house, he died because his body stopped working and he is always with us because he is on our hearts and our memories. I am not sure the 4 yr old understands any more then the 2 yr old or vice versa, but I am sure that the idea of an afterlife has not occurred to either of them naturally; it is a purely external construct. When they encounter the concept I intend to use the 'some people think...' prefix to any answers; I have had to do it with some of the Santy myths already. We will have to face further challenges to our lack of belief in the future, but for now it is fascinating to me to see the minds unencumbered by superstition develop.
robindch wrote: » Santa at nine? I'd drop a hint or two, lest she mentions it to somebody at her school :)The topic's come up with my kid a few times, and the answer's the same -- people are born, they live, they die, then they go into the ground to give birth to flowers and trees, while the living remember them. She gets it to the extent that she's asked to visit graveyards to see the plants and told me a few weeks back what she wants growing on hers (pink and yellow roses). Not exactly a fun conversation I have to say, but hands down, it beats feeding kids bullshit. btw, we don't use euphemisms like "pass away", "pass on" etc either -- just simple "die". No metaphors either. Just the facts. And she's fine with that.
jank wrote: » Id say your a barrel of laughs....
jank wrote: » Spelling checks now?
jank wrote: » Spelling checks now? Sums up this forum in fairness.
jank wrote: » People would take you guys a lot more seriously if you werent so militant
jank wrote: » and steadfast in your opinions.
jank wrote: » You know I share probably 95% of the same ideas as most of the people here but this board seems to be an outlet for those who want to bash anything and everything that doesn't conform to their own view point. Arrogant isn't the word.
Mark Hamill wrote: » Who is being violent or proposing violence?
Mark Hamill wrote: » I dont want to be taken seriously be the type of people who would only take me seriously if I didn't really believe in my own opinions.
Ickle Magoo wrote: » Says he who only posted to throw around personal insults at someone who made a suggestion that doesn't conform with your own view point...pot...kettle...black....