FlutterinBantam wrote: » WTF This lad seems to be deep in the smelly stuff. Still holding a spot in Dail Eireann.:eek:
Nevore wrote: » Decent coffe, decent food. That puts it leagues ahead of pretty much every where else in the city.
ebixa82 wrote: » Flutt's talking sense as always I see!
wild_cat wrote: » Its a limited company.........
FlutterinBantam wrote: » Yep, Das roiihat man. Parse it and analyse it man and you will see I am talking sense. People who while they are on top of an artificial bubble can be forgiven for believing they are omnipotent, can strew banners across the nations bridges promulgating their individual views. And, get this, they expect the public and taxpayer to heed them:D Lift has shot to bottom Mick, get used to it.
ebixa82 wrote: » What language are you speaking? Completely ignorant and incoherent rambling as always. Trying to decipher your posts is next to impossible. They're like Ross O'Carroll Kelly on crack.
FlutterinBantam wrote: » No couldn't be indeed. If he stuck to what he was good at instead of stringing banners across his projects and trying to 'hippiese' the electorate. These lads are good at something , it's when they try to influence the electorate and take them for idiots is their snag point. Just do what you are paid to do Mick, leave the peripheral stuff and the politicking to those who understand it. fcuking public are not idiots;)
FlutterinBantam wrote: » WTF This lad seems to be deep in the smelly stuff. Still holding a spot in Dail Eireann.:eek: I hear that his companies are about to be taken over, and yet he portrays and projects a liberal image such as legalising weed and using his 'projects' to facilitate anti EU stuff. Chickens have come home to roost Mick;)
FlutterinBantam wrote: » Sometimes people who can't take the truth, throw up a flim flam excuse. Address the point man, or back off.
Benny_Cake wrote: » Mick Wallace got elected in Wexford on the first count: http://www.electionsireland.org/candidate.cfm?ID=6103 So by your definition the public ARE idiots. Right?
OutlawPete wrote: » He owes money alright, but it's nothing compared to his wealth. He owns all those Italian restaurants beside the Millennium Bridge for one thing and an enormous property portfolio abroad and in this country also, that far exceeds his supposed possible debts. One thing about the guy, all throughout the 90's, I always remember seeing his barnet sticking up from many a hole in a road. Whatever he owns, I think he earned it.
FlutterinBantam wrote: » Sharp let down Mick.
hardCopy wrote: » ACC => Rabo => Dutch
Nevermind_ wrote: » A person of wealth doesnt have a 20 million judgment against them if they can pay the debt, he obviously cant. Also receivers have been appointed to his companies. The guy is at best insolvent and is going to loose all his assets except the family home, at worst he is broke and will be made bankrupt and may have to sell even his house. That is the reality here either way hes fcuked.
FlutterinBantam wrote: » Is it? Mickey said on RTE 1 that he was personally liable for a lot of the stuff. If I heard it right that is.
gonedrinking wrote: » So he owes 42 million to the taxpayer. Him and his son paid themselves salaries of 289,000 for the year from the company. On top of that the taxpayer is paying him a TDs salary and expenses. Fcuking scandalous. I want my money back you scruffy fcuker.
cosanostra wrote: » He doesn't owe the tax payer 42mil he owes acc bank it and the are not state owned or guaranteed! He has the exact same right to earn his TDs salary as any of the rest of them
orourkeda wrote: » Will he lose his seat if declared bankrupt?