tallaghtmick wrote: » as it went in keenan and kel.......AWWWWWWWW HERE WE GO AGAIN.
RichieC wrote: » Awww here it goes
My name is URL wrote: » Because of the actions of a few knuckle dragging scummers, you feel the respect shown by the Queen was unwarranted?
There were no reports of any injuries
Cristian Calm Net wrote: » I think the OP mean's that these scum planting bombs will see the queen's bow as legitimizing (spelling?) their 'cause'?. If so this the time when we all (Irish men and women) have to stand firm in the face of terror and say "NOT IN MY NAME".
Cristian Calm Net wrote: » If so this the time when we all (Irish men and women) have to stand firm in the face of terror and say "NOT IN MY NAME".
later10 wrote: » We have also spoken of heroes who died for Irish independence, all the while apparently blind to the fact that if some of those men were alive today they would have been down on Moorse Street protesting the royal visit, not celebrating the current status. Perhaps this man who planted this bomb was not all that different, in his political outlook, to the IRB of 1916. The whole thing is a little deranged.
later10 wrote: » I don't think it was the Queen's bow as search, but you're right. Most of the country has just spent almost a week admiring 'gallant Irish soldiers' marching and playing brass bands to honour our very own Glorious Dead. We have spoken of heroes who died for Irish independence, all the while apparently blind to the fact that if some of those men were alive today they would have been down on Moorse Street protesting the royal visit, not celebrating the current status. The whole thing is a little deranged.
mgmt wrote: » What??? The men of 1916 stood out onto the GPO and read a signed declaration of independence. Open and transparent and in uniform.
mgmt wrote: » What??? The men of 1916 stood out onto the GPO and read a signed declaration of independence. Open and transparent and in uniform. Just like what had taken place on the first reading of the US Declaration of Independence in Boston. The fat scumbag in Derry had to hide behind a mask.
Zebra3 wrote: » However the facts remain that they had no mandate from the people and the people lined up to hurl abuse at them and empty their chamberpots over them after their surrender.
later10 wrote: » I don't think that's the driver behind this latest attack necessarily, but I do think it might help legitimise these attacks in the minds of the perpetrators.
gigino wrote: » +1. Far more chose to serve in British uniform than to rebel in 1916. According to http://www.waterfordcountymuseum.org/exhibit/web/Display/article/31 for example, "350,000 Irishmen volunteered for service during WW1 in addition to the 50,000 Irishmen already serving in the regular army and reserve at the outbreak of the war. ".
Cristian Calm Net wrote: » we've been brought to our knee's from within, and we'll stay down on our knee's if we don't start standing up for ourselves - to the banks, the developers, government, TERRORISTS - we're a new people now.
later10 wrote: » I didn't say they were similar in their methods, I said their political outlook may be similar. You just know these quasi-IRA/ RIRA types admire Wolfe Tone and O'Leary and Pearse and it is not unreasonable to suggest that they saw the honouring of these men last week as a sort of justification to their cause, which they see themselves as advancing in their own way today. I don't think that's the driver behind this latest attack necessarily, but I do think it might help legitimise these attacks in the minds of the perpetrators.
Adamisconfused wrote: » I would be shocked if even one of them thought that. As far as they are concerned, the thirty two county republic, as declared in 1916, exists to this day and they are the rightful government.