Seachmall wrote: » We're all aware of the high unemployment rates in this country and the fact that a large number of those claiming the dole are merely leeching with no intention of every actually looking for a job, while the others are genuinely unemployed and can't find work. Why not take those who do want to work and train them as dole inspectors. They can weed out those who are not seeking employment (and thus not entitled to jobseekers allowance/benefits) and tell them to get f*cked. I suspect they'd do well at the job given they've actually needed the benefits while these scumbags claimed out of laziness, giving them a bad name. That way you kill two birds with one stone. What ya think?
Dangerous Man wrote: » I've said it before and I'll say it again - rape everybody.
Yakult wrote: » These kind of animals people are still around? I thought with the massive amount of job creation and high employment rate that are around now would have eliminated these animals "people..
Elisabeth Blanctorche wrote: » I think the dole should be cut to items instead of saving the repayments for example. Family with 2 kids (weekly) = 3 loafs of bread, 5 cans of beans, 2.5kg of potatoes, 500g pasta, and some other items. A single person living on their own = 2 loafs of bread, 3 cans of beans, 1 can of peas, 1kg potatoes, 500g rice. If they need a bus fare for a job interview, they have to go to the local unemployment office and request the return amount, no problem. What else would they spend taxpayers money on that is acceptable??
sirbob wrote: » id like to start this by sayin i was on the dole for 2 yrs before i got the hell outa der .... the dole in ireland is to high i turned down a few jobs because i was comin home wif less money workin than i was on the dole its a **** set up i dont care wat anyone says ... an for ur scheme ur an idiot dats not the way to do it the ppl hu wanna wor will work or der dole if u let them they need more fas style scheme in place were ppl work in der local community claenin up maintainin grass areas an flower beds an keepin public areas clean tidy towns sorta stuff der are ppl hu wud do this if the insentive was der if it was run rite after 6 month on the dole lookin for work you shud have to sugn up to one of these jus a few hours a week if not ur doles cut if after a yr u dont wif out good reason it gets curt further an by yr to no more dole unless u participate thus killin 2 birds wif one stone cleaner ireland an ppl eran der dole ...... i cud go on but i got other stuff to do its time for a swim ha comments welcome
tdv123 wrote: » Where do I sign up?
PrincessLola wrote: » Sure they'd die of vitamin defeciencies but what the heck!!
haydar wrote: » Should there not be a Recession Forum for all these threads?
zenno wrote: » FFS not this garbage again. why don't you get on with you're life and stop bitching about social welfare entitlements.
Elisabeth Blanctorche wrote: » No, quite the opposite actually. If you eliminate their ability to purchase alcohol, cigarettes, then they will actually be healthier which in turn would reduce their impact on public health spending.
Elisabeth Blanctorche wrote: » What is frightening about my suggestions are how they are dismissed instantly as "radical" or "extreme" where in some countries (USA, Italy + most of Asia) you would be considered lucky to have a weekly ration of food completely free.