psni wrote: » Looking at the very first line of the Humanities charter, this thread would probably be better suited in there. (Just a suggestion)
TeddyTedson wrote: » I'm not sure if I agree with that. Not trying to be a smart arse.
Micky Dolenz wrote: » I would think it is a lot more common then we like to think.
Wibbs wrote: » I agree there. What is odd is the growth of the cutting version in the last 20 years. It was a lot rarer in the past. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/sep2004/harm-s23.shtml Maybe the underlying issues were there but the outward expression was different.
Nevore wrote: » Needless to say I have zero contact with her now.
talkinyite wrote: » Sure there's loads of forms of self harm: smoking, eating crap food, piercings, scarification etc. Some are slow suicides and others just leave reminders & help some people get through.
Wibbs wrote: » It was a lot rarer in the past.
syklops wrote: » How very supportive of you.
irish jay wrote: » if you want to talk about this topic.... contact me ....ive a family member and a friend that had this issue and the have zero contact comment two above is so not the answer for this topic.
Poor Uncle Tom wrote: » I wouldn't necessarily agree here. I'd say it was far less publicised in the past. I think we are very very slowly coming out of the dark ages in regard to these issues right now. It would have been almost unheard of to have an open discussion on self harm 20 or 30 years ago.
bluewolf wrote: » Of course you should be supportive but it sounded from N's post that he was talking about manipulation rather than seeking help
Wibbs wrote: » Dealing with someone with a mental illness can be very trying. In my opinion and sadly experience too, probably one of the hardest things to deal with on a daily basis. It can really pick away at the person on the receiving end. I'd not be too quick to judge someone for not wanting to be around it. Especially after a breakup. Like I said I've done it. More than once. Was I some hero to do so? No. In retrospect would I do it again? No way.
Wibbs wrote: » I'm always puzzled as to why the assumption in mental illnesses is that there's not been an increase, just better reporting. There's something to that, but I personally doubt it's the whole story. Not by a long shot.
TaraFoxglove wrote: » Why would it puzzle you? There was and still is to a lesser extent a huge stigma attached to mental illness. My granny still calls depression "nerves". Back in the day, people were institutionalised. That happens a lot less now so it's more visible.
Wibbs wrote: » I am puzzled as to why people are so sure that it's always been at this level. Obesity hasn't so why not some mental illnesses? There is a cultural component to both IMHO.
Daegerty wrote: » Self harm is a bit 2004 isn't it?
Naikon wrote: » "Self Harm" is a bit of a dubious term. Psychiatrists will label everything and anything these days if the DSM diagnostic criteria are anything to go by. Bit of a joke. Ever stop to think excessive Paranoia may just be a genetic trait, and not a real illness? Standard Paranoia is not illness:mad: Back on topic, self harm is very common I would imagine. Cutting yourself could just be an attention thing.