easyeason3 wrote: » I usually get a selection of newspapers on a Sunday morning & the Sunday World is one of them. It's not the greatest paper by any stretch but it's handy to flick through while cooking a fry. Anyway there's a journalist on it called Geraldine Comiskey & I have yet to see an article where she is not wearing as little as she can get away with & striking 'provocative' poses. I know I shouldn't expect much from a tabloid but I mean it's ridiculous at this stage. I don't even read the articles because her attempt at looking 'sexy' puts me off. And Amanda Brunker, wtf is the story with her wearing mad red lipstick in most photos? I know this is trivial but it's really getting on my nerves. I could stop buying the paper but then I'd have to find something else to rant about on a Sunday morning. Has anyone else noticed this?
Oranage2 wrote: » Would you like a saucer of milk my dear?
Saila wrote: » yeah, leave you're man card on the table on the way out
UglyBolloxFace wrote: » Why does everyone on Boards assume everyone here is male?
easyeason3 wrote: » Only if it's served at room temperature & on bone china. It does kinda look like I'm jealous doesn't it? Except I'm not. I just find it a little bit insulting that they get a female journalist to tart herself up to make an article more appealing. She could be a really nice person but those photos just don't give her any credibility at all.
mickdw wrote: » Met that geraldine woman at a mazda day at mondello park. She came across as being pretty much crazy but is a nice enough woman.
Doublin wrote: » It is one of the tabloids I sometimes get on a Sunday with the others(usually take 3), but yes she is annoying - no subject matter, just pictures of her beside men. Nice figure, odd face.. How old is she? Didn't get it today, got the NOTW because of the headline saying they confronted one of the Ryan's. Very revealing stuff As for the other one in the SW, we shouldn't say much because Degsy might still hold a torch for her...
What revealing stuff did they uncover?
And Degsy holds a torch for Amanda or wants to put a torch to her?
STIG83 wrote: » I dont mind her at all, whats wrong with showing a bit of flesh now and again? She has some body on her.
easyeason3 wrote: » She has some body to be fair. I can't think of the photographers name but he came over to photograph hundreds of people naked & there was a photo of her in the SW running along a beach amoungst other naked people. She looked really well. But for her as a journalist do you not think it's a bit tacky?
easyeason3 wrote: » And Amanda Brunker, wtf is the story with her wearing mad red lipstick in most photos?