PaintDoctor wrote: » Friend was stopped by a Gard checkpoint in Ballincollig this week, and there was a Social Welfare officer present. Asked him as many questions as they could, who he was, what was his PPS number was he working, same questions to the other people in the vehicle. Anyone else find it a tad too much? We're paying out millions to non-nationals who have no interest in working at all, and the ordinary guy on the street now can't take his car out on the road without being given the 3rd degree.
mudokon wrote: » You made it easy to drag the thread off topic by singling out non-nationals
PaintDoctor wrote: » True. I guess that's cause I'd chatted to a taxi driver at the weekend who'd collected 2 non-nationals, 2 kids, all their shopping and couldn't believe what he told me. They put all their shopping in which filled the boot, and left the buggies behind because the social welfare would give them two more.
staker wrote: » I always took it for granted people knew their PPS tbh,I know mine.
PaintDoctor wrote: » True. I guess that's cause I'd chatted to a taxi driver at the weekend who'd collected 2 non-nationals, 2 kids, all their shopping and couldn't believe what he told me. They put all their shopping in which filled the boot, and left the buggies behind because the social welfare would give them two more. So - that's my bad, and I probably shouldn't have posted that. Obviously too late now as I've pulled the trigger, but I'll retract that.
corkcomp wrote: » social welfare officers are well known for using every trick in the book to catch people out. I know a guy who was on the dole while working as a carpenter, he had his own van full of tools etc and he used to borrow his mothers car to go to the social welfare office because they had people checking for presence of vans / work vehicles!
PaintDoctor wrote: » Honestly, I'd say he was being genuine. I know they can spout all sorts of crap at the best of times - like all of us I suppose - but this didn't have your usual story full of holes spin you'd normally get with a made up tale. He wasn't in the Taxi at the time, and had a look of general disappointment telling it to me. evilivor - have I done something to upset you?
feelingstressed wrote: » Ah the buggy story? I first heard that in Galway around 2003, then I moved to Belfast and despite having another system I was told it. Heard it in Dublin too. And on Pat Kenny's radio show There are scams out there, this buggy is a tall tale though. In ten years time someone else will tell you the same story about leaving a buggy behind
PaintDoctor wrote: » I'm going out with a non-national for over 5 years. What you misconstrued as racism, was something else - and I don't appreciate being accused of it, I'm about as anti-racism as they come. I guess I'm more against the policy which allows people coming into the country purely for the purpose of mooching off the state rather than wanting to make a go of things. I do agree with you about the checkpoints - if they work, then good. I just think there's been a whole glut of checkpoints hit Cork in the last 2 weeks, Diesel, the usual Insurance/Tax/NCT, and now this. I just think that while checkpoints are a great thing that too many of them at the one time makes people feel like they're living in a police state.
PaintDoctor wrote: » I had hoped to have a discussion about whether or not in the current climate with pressure on people like it's never been before if it's fair to have so many checkpoints like we've had in the last few weeks, and also to make people aware of the fact that there are extra checkpoints on the road.
Cadyboo wrote: » You dont have to tell them anything. Either the guards or social welfare. How dare they stop cars and waste gardai time to catch someone on the dole, when there are drug dealers out there making more money than us and the guards put together. But it's a criminal offence to knowingly obtain monies under false pretences,maybe not on the grand and more evil scale as drug dealers but it's still acrime that needs to be clamped down on. I'd imagine any persons who would be flagged on the roadside as guilty of SW fraud would hardly come quietly to be reprimanded, therefore the gardai I'd say. Cadyboo wrote: » Im sorry but they left the bankers and politicians off with millions so why get involved in social welfare money. That makes no sense imo. Cadyboo wrote: » And how do they do that?? Ok if someone has tools or work clothes on but other than that I dont understand how they can determine anything from someone being in a car! This I'd agree with, giving that any builder or tradesman or whoever who has gone bust could very well have been using his jeep,van,lorry whatever as his main means of transport back in the day anyhow.
But it's a criminal offence to knowingly obtain monies under false pretences,maybe not on the grand and more evil scale as drug dealers but it's still acrime that needs to be clamped down on. I'd imagine any persons who would be flagged on the roadside as guilty of SW fraud would hardly come quietly to be reprimanded, therefore the gardai I'd say. Cadyboo wrote: » Im sorry but they left the bankers and politicians off with millions so why get involved in social welfare money. That makes no sense imo. Cadyboo wrote: » And how do they do that?? Ok if someone has tools or work clothes on but other than that I dont understand how they can determine anything from someone being in a car! This I'd agree with, giving that any builder or tradesman or whoever who has gone bust could very well have been using his jeep,van,lorry whatever as his main means of transport back in the day anyhow.
Cadyboo wrote: » Im sorry but they left the bankers and politicians off with millions so why get involved in social welfare money. That makes no sense imo. Cadyboo wrote: » And how do they do that?? Ok if someone has tools or work clothes on but other than that I dont understand how they can determine anything from someone being in a car! This I'd agree with, giving that any builder or tradesman or whoever who has gone bust could very well have been using his jeep,van,lorry whatever as his main means of transport back in the day anyhow.
That makes no sense imo. Cadyboo wrote: » And how do they do that?? Ok if someone has tools or work clothes on but other than that I dont understand how they can determine anything from someone being in a car! This I'd agree with, giving that any builder or tradesman or whoever who has gone bust could very well have been using his jeep,van,lorry whatever as his main means of transport back in the day anyhow.
Cadyboo wrote: » And how do they do that?? Ok if someone has tools or work clothes on but other than that I dont understand how they can determine anything from someone being in a car!
staker wrote: » But it's a criminal offence to knowingly obtain monies under false pretences,maybe not on the grand and more evil scale as drug dealers but it's still acrime that needs to be clamped down on. I'd imagine any persons who would be flagged on the roadside as guilty of SW fraud would hardly come quietly to be reprimanded, therefore the gardai I'd say.