Tessa Huge Registrar wrote: » Nope.
Iker Spicy Minor wrote: » hehe, reminds me of a time when I was working in a pub as a bouncer part-time. What most people don't let on is what happens before the bouncer reacts. Nobody grabbed your throat for no reason. Oh i'd say there's more to this story, speaking from experience of course.
Stevo1011 wrote: » well they are, especially the ones in clondalkin
steddyeddy wrote: » what type of person is that
RoverJames wrote: » Well folks who don't have trouble getting into pubs and clubs would generally be- dressed appropriately - not intoxicated - able to converse with the door staff about their evening so far (where they have been etc) - be of a generally pleasant disposition Those who have trouble getting into pubs and clubs would not satisfy one or more of the above points generally. If you are getting stopped by doorstaff regularly in many different pubs and clubs the issue would most likely be not the doorstaff
Offside wrote: » Funny how one of the only times I didn't get into a club was last monday after a rugby match, had a small cut on my chin from the match and had had about 4 pints, bouncer takes one look at my chin, obviously decides I've been fighting and pushes me out of the queue saying I'd had "too much" without even talking to me and not allowing me to explain the cut (as it was obviously the reason), there wasn't an especially big queue at the time and he was shoving loads of others out of the queue after looking at them for a half second.
leggo wrote: » Here's the flip side to that: it's a Monday night and probably a quieter one in the pub, meaning the bouncer is possibly on his own or has very little back-up if trouble broke out. So he doesn't want to take ANY risks in letting people in for his own safety. It doesn't mean a thing to him if business is dead. Licensed premises HAVE to give right to refuse to bouncers in order to stay licensed.
Offside wrote: » When I say there wasn't a huge queue, it was still full enough inside and in bojangles/diceys/russell court there certainly is a big amount of back up.
leggo wrote: » Well, with respect man, looking at it from the other side your story is changing already. On one hand you said there was hardly anyone in the queue implying that he should have let you in because of that...then you say it was really busy in your next post. It just sounds to me like he wasn't in the mood for taking any chances considering he wasn't letting many in. That said, he could have been just an arsehole. I'm not going to name any venues, but I know certain city centre venues have (certain) bouncers with the kind of inferiority complex that unfortunately feeds into the stereotype the country has for the rest.
canonball5 wrote: » i find it funny that all the guys defending bouncers,are bouncers!!
I-Shot-Jr wrote: » A guy I know is a bouncer for a well known bar/club in the city centre, he says he hates it with all his guts. Probably one of the loveliest guys I've ever had the pleasure to meet. He says that its not him that gets to decide who gets in or not but somebody watching with a camera in a room somewhere and that he has had to on occasion refuse entry to friends of his. He says the entire process is soul destroying and I can understand why. My point being, I feel sorry for bouncers. Obviously those that are in it for the power trip are absolute cnuts though.
TimeToShine wrote: » I didn't know any of the clubs had cameras outside, which one is it?
steddyeddy wrote: » well i know the martello in bray operates from a system like this.
seanybiker wrote: » Sure does. seen one of the videos actually a few weeks back lol.
I-Shot-Jr wrote: » He says that its not him that gets to decide who gets in or not but somebody watching with a camera in a room somewhere and that he has had to on occasion refuse entry to friends of his.
knird evol wrote: » There's two types of people involved in these situations Customers with authority issues. Bouncers who let authority go to their head. I think both are in the minority in their respective groups.
steddyeddy wrote: » Well I only know about it because of a accusation made about a bouncer there which happened to make the paper.
seanybiker wrote: » Ah right i see. i presume the bouncer got done then?
TimeToShine wrote: » He said clubs in the City Centre though, I don't think any of them have security cameras outside them, but if there are I'd like to know.