tommy21 wrote: » Is this for wheel?!
k_mac wrote: » Another genius scam. Almost as good as suing the NHS for being too fat with the added bonus of not being too fat.
dilallio wrote: » Not the judges fault. He only approved the OFFER from Smyths.
DarkJager wrote: » Ridiculous amount for what was essentially a non event. If the bike had fallen on her instead of near her the compo would be deserved, but Post traumatic stress?? What a load of bull****. The youth of today are too wrapped in cotton wool for their own good. For all the trees I fell out of, bikes I fell off and cuts I got as a kid it never had any impact on me apart from needing a plaster or 2. We've got a generation of absolute wimps following us up.
reverenddave wrote: » http://www.mileanhour.com/files/2010/9/The-90s.jpg
curlzy wrote: » That's just depressing, we're turning in the USA
dilallio wrote: » Not the judges fault. He only approved the OFFER from Smyths. I wonder how many child psychiatrists the family contacted before they got this guy.
Deleted User wrote: » While I understand that Smyths were in the wrong for haphazardly stocking the bike, €10,000 is a bit much, especially taken into account that the child wasn't harmed. Post-traumatic stress? That sounds a bit ridiculous for a 6 year old.
@Overheal - I understand how a child being bitten by a child can lead to said child being afraid of dogs,
so does a bike landing in front of a child lead them to being afraid of bikes? Smyths? Gravity?
Overheal wrote: » Smyth's offered the settlement amount. The parent's didn't specify 10k. ? :P ? You would have to ask a child psychologist and be intimate with the incident. Was the girl running around the store when the incident happened, does the child feel that by wandering off on her own she brought it on herself? When she hear's sudden loud noises is she afraid something is about to crush her? I can't answer that.
Duggy747 wrote: » Fùck, I should've been a millionare by now with all the crap that happened to me when I was little, I don't even remember most of the events :pac: So what, anytime she sees a bike she'll freeze, stare into the distance and have Vietnam-esque flashbacks? :pac:
kelle wrote: » I was in Smyth's in Blanchardstown a few years ago when a huge Lego box fell to the floor a few feet away from me, while my daughter was a newborn asleep in the pram! It frightened the life out of me that it could have fallen on her had I been a few steps forward, and I let them know that they should have these boxes secured when they're up at such a height. No, i didn't sue!
kelle wrote: » I was in Smyth's in Blanchardstown a few years ago when a huge Lego box fell to the floor a few feet away from me, while my daughter was a newborn asleep in the pram! It frightened the life out of me
Overheal wrote: » But did you suffer PTSD as a result of the incident? As diagnosed by a specialist?
Morlar wrote: » Pretty sure most human beings will have had something fall over in their vicinity during the course of their infancy/childhood. The notion that this constitutes post traumatic stress disorder is pathetic.
Duggy747 wrote: » Vietnam-esque flashbacks? :pac:
Overheal wrote: » Who are you to say whether the child actually has PTSD or not, in all fairness? Nobody is arguing that everybody who has something fall near them is going to develop PTSD.
He told the court her GP had referred her to consultant child psychologist Mr Andrew Conway. Mr Conway, on the basis of symptoms including hypersensitivity to noise such as thunder storms, fire crackers, cars backfiring, and an unwillingness to engage with other children, diagnosed her as having suffered a post traumatic reaction of a moderate type.