bigjimmy wrote: » Hi can any one shed any light on this... I have recently read that since 2001, any RC that made the final pool received a start date..if this is the case, will this campaign be any different, providing their vetting has cleared and every thing else is in order???
gigity gigity wrote: » Someone said on here that they had cleared everything but had still been dear johned so unfortunatly not. As well as that I think that a lot of us will be disappointed because March will be the last intake and only half the places will be up for grabs this time around.
gigity gigity wrote: » Hopefully your right. Any theories on what you might think will happen in March?
Hopefull1 wrote: » Hey guys, I havn't posted in a long time but after reading a lot of posts I just wanted to keep everyones hopes up about the intakes. I know a trainer in Garnaville and he/she told me that, as this is the last campaign he/she believes that they may 'milk' out as many intakes as they can as there is no further campaigns after March. So just because March is the end of the campaigns, does not necessarily mean it is the end of intakes from the last campaign. I have posted this in the Rumour Mill as it is obviously only what they have said but I do see them as a reliable source as they also told me that there was going to be, October and December intakes long before calls went out and when everyone thought the FREEZE was going to be in place. Lets just keep Fingers crossed.....
wanadrum wrote: » Unfortunately in the public sector things rarely appear to be done by logic, they appear to love wasting money!
Question 14Is it possible for a candidate, who has scored well at the Assessment Centre phase, but whose medical or security vetting has been delayed, to be passed over in favour of another candidate who has perhaps not scored as well but whose medical and security vetting processes have been completed?AnswerThe PSNI make offers of appointment to successful candidates under the merit principles and in line with the 50/50 arrangements. In the circumstances described, our practice has been to hold a place until the process is completed. However, as we approach the end of the 50/50 arrangements in March next year, and are predicting no recruitment in the year 2011/12, there will be no provision to carry forward appointments beyond this date. In this case, and as the PSNI must fulfil its legislative obligations under 50/50 to appoint the required numbers by the end of March, it is possible that candidates whose medical or vetting outcomes remain outstanding may be passed over in favour of the next appointable candidate on the order of merit. Every effort will be made to avoid this outcome but there can be no guarantee, because of the practicalities of the ending of the legislation.