nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Women Do Not Enjoy Sex

starbelgrade

Or so says Stephen Fry....

The openly homosexual broadcaster said it was clear that women had no interest in sex from the fact that they do not go out seeking casual encounters in graveyards or on Hampstead Heath.

He claimed that women only go to bed with men “because sex is the price they are willing to pay for a relationship”. He said: "If women liked sex as much as men, there would be straight cruising areas in the way there are gay cruising areas. Women would go and hang around in churchyards thinking: 'God, I've got to get my f
rocks off', or they'd go to Hampstead Heath and meet strangers to shag behind a bush.

“It doesn't happen. Why? Because the only women you can have sex with like that wish to be paid for it."

He continued: "I feel sorry for straight men. The only reason women will have sex with them is that sex is the price they are willing to pay for a relationship with a man, which is what they want.

“Of course, a lot of women will deny this and say, 'Oh no, but I love sex, I love it!' But do they go around having it the way that gay men do?"

Link ; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/8099784/Stephen-Fry-angers-feminists-by-claiming-women-do-not-enjoy-sex.html

Hmm. Has Fry got a point, or is he just trolling?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Wibbs

Not another one. I do like him but sweet jesus he is bloody precious at times.

Rabble Rabble

He is talking about the free wheeling male gay lifestyle, as opposed to the female version of settling. Let's take cottaging. Doesn't happen hetrosexually.

Can't go onto communal jacks in london and expect my dick sucked off by a woman, it is easy enough for gay men. ( Of course in a heterosexual cottage the gory holes would be big enough for some reciprocation - at least some fingering).

so why dont women pop in Jacks to suck of, or get fingered in a glory hole?

Rabble Rabble

Sink The Banana wrote: »

Good point ,I suppose it would

The point about dogging is it always couples. Single mean cannot turn up and expect to find single women there at the same ratio. In fact single men are banned, more or less, and that is true of most sex clubs too. And on sex sites the ratio of men to women is 10-1.

(Well unless there is money involved.)

RoundyMooney

Stephen Fry wrote:

“Of course, a lot of women will deny this and say, 'Oh no, but I love sex, I love it!' But do they go around having it the way that gay men do?"

There's an in yer endo in there somewhere, I just know it.

laugh

I think he was making fun of the idea that all gay men are always horny and riding all the time in toilets and bushes.

My name is URL

humanji wrote: »

Hmmm, has Fry given up Twitter because of this?

Just noticed that.. He no longer has the 'Verified Account' seal on his page either. I'm a big fan of his but do actually wish he'd cut back on his twittering and focus more on the stuff that endeared him so much to people in the first place.

Although, this time last year - http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article6898420.ece

Shenshen

starbelgrade wrote: »

Or so says Stephen Fry....

Link ; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/8099784/Stephen-Fry-angers-feminists-by-claiming-women-do-not-enjoy-sex.html

Hmm. Has Fry got a point, or is he just trolling?

*roflmao

As a woman, I have to admit he's got a point. Why can't we have straight cruising areas? I would LOVE that!!!
But as things are, you get strange looks just for telling people that you like to f*ck people other than your husband.

liah

He may have quit temporarily but my guess is that this caught him at bad timing.

There's two things we know about Stephen:

1) He loves Twitter and being technologically linked to people. He's a nerd.
2) He's manic depressive/bi-polar to a fairly serious degree.

Chances are he'll be back when he goes into an up swing. I doubt he'd be able to resist the internet for very long, especially Twitter.

K-9

My name is URL wrote: »

Just noticed that.. He no longer has the 'Verified Account' seal on his page either. I'm a big fan of his but do actually wish he'd cut back on his twittering and focus more on the stuff that endeared him so much to people in the first place.

Although, this time last year - http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article6898420.ece

He has been quiet the last few weeks, think he is away on a film set.

Min

Stephen Fry - Joking?

You mean he wasn't intelligent enough to see the reaction which has now left him pissed off.

Ush1

Simple evolutionary reasons why women don't want sex as often as men.

Basq

K-9 wrote: »

He has been quiet the last few weeks, think he is away on a film set.

Yeah.. real quiet!

11:54 AM Oct 30th via Twitter for iPhone
11:52 AM Oct 30th via Twitter for iPhone
7:20 AM Oct 30th via Twitter for iPhone
7:17 AM Oct 30th via Twitter for iPhone
10:22 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPhone in reply to caitlinmoran
10:03 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPad in reply to Will_Taylor_1
9:48 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPhone
9:29 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPad
9:23 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPad
9:18 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPhone
8:29 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPhone
6:50 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPhone
4:23 AM Oct 29th via web
2:22 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPhone
12:20 AM Oct 29th via Twitter for iPhone
7:05 AM Oct 28th via Twitter for iPhone in reply to williamgodfree
7:04 AM Oct 28th via Twitter for iPhone

:eek:

Morlar

liah wrote: »

There's two things we know about Stephen:

1) He loves Twitter and being technologically linked to people. He's a nerd.
2) He's manic depressive/bi-polar to a fairly serious degree.

A third thing we know is that we are not on first name terms.

thebigbiffo

if he was joking:

it's funny cos it's true...

miseeire

I believe Mr.Fry has an addiction with being in the spotlight and he will do or say anything to feed his addiction.

humanji

miseeire wrote: »

I believe Mr.Fry has an addiction with being in the spotlight and he will do or say anything to feed his addiction.

Or he's just having a laugh.

liah

Morlar wrote: »

A third thing we know is that we are not on first name terms.

Oh jesus. His name is Stephen Fry. I typed Stephen. I'm clearly just so presumptuous, how dare I!

Stephen is faster to type than Stephen Fry. We are on the topic of Stephen Fry. It can be assumed that the Stephen I was referring to was that of the Fry nature.

Colloquial speaking isn't a crime.

Plus, I find titles kinda outdated.

Kimono-Girl

thebigbiffo wrote: »

it's funny cos it's true...

no it's not :eek:

I am a woman, i enjoy sex, frequently.;)

maybe Mr.Fry is just not that good at it???

Rabble Rabble

Kimono-Girl wrote: »

no it's not :eek:

I am a woman, i enjoy sex, frequently.;)

maybe Mr.Fry is just not that good at it???

Lets knock this "not any good at it" on the head. He is gay. He has never slept with a woman.

Rabble Rabble

liah wrote: »

Oh jesus. His name is Stephen Fry. I typed Stephen. I'm clearly just so presumptuous, how dare I!

Stephen is faster to type than Stephen Fry. We are on the topic of Stephen Fry. It can be assumed that the Stephen I was referring to was that of the Fry nature.

Colloquial speaking isn't a crime.

Plus, I find titles kinda outdated.

I've met him and I call him Lord Fry of hampsted. He insists.

Rabble Rabble

Ush1 wrote: »

Simple evolutionary reasons why women don't want sex as often as men.

Dont start bringing science into a debate where we get angry with EVIL MISOGYNISTS!!.

iguana

Rabble Rabble wrote: »

Dont start bringing science into a debate where we get angry with EVIL MISOGYNISTS!!.

Bring all of the science that you like but not amateur cod-science like that in the post you quoted.

K-9

iguana wrote: »

Bring all of the science that you like but not amateur cod-science like that in the post you quoted.

Society also evolves over time.

There have been radical changes in Ireland over the last couple of decades. Some attitudes just haven't caught up with that.

Rabble Rabble

iguana wrote: »

Bring all of the science that you like but not amateur cod-science like that in the post you quoted.

What cod science is that? All evolutionary theorists on sexual activity I have ever read say that there is a reason for women's less casual attitude to sex related to obvious biological reasons - i.e. getting left with the baby.

What I cant do today, as I already pointed out, is go and get ( or give) a quick blowjob from a (female) stranger where looks dont matter, as is the case with glory holes.

Some average looking gay guy has had a quickie with George Michael, I dont think I will be meeting Cherly Cole in a bathroom anytime soon.

Sex is harder to get than it should be, given that it gives both people pleasure. The reason is not men.

iguana

Rabble Rabble wrote: »

What cod science is that? All evolutionary theorists on sexual activity I have ever read say that there is a reason for women's less casual attitude to sex related to obvious biological reasons - i.e. getting left with the baby.

You mustn't read much on the subject so. You've never gotten as far as polyanderous anthropology or heteropaternal-superfecundation which is pretty basic stuff, imo. It sounds like you've been reading pseudo-science based on subjective empirical evidence used to back up monotheistic beliefs.

Richard Dower

Snakeblood wrote: »

If I was a celebrity I'd tape all my interviews and then release the tapes publicly if I felt I was misquoted.

See how some ****ing journalist likes trolling and leading questions being put out in the public domain to make them look like a heel.

N.B. Working under the assumption that S. Fry was genuinely misquoted.

Quoted for truth, i find it BIZARRE that they don't have an audio or video recording of the interviews they do, it's a sure fire way to fight back and prove you've been misquoted.

candy-gal1

Joey the lips wrote: »

i think thats a reasonable conclusion when you consider

men want it once a month and women want it 5 times a day....

FYP

Richard Dower

iguana wrote: »

You mustn't read much on the subject so. You've never gotten as far as polyanderous anthropology or heteropaternal-superfecundation which is pretty basic stuff, imo. It sounds like you've been reading pseudo-science based on subjective empirical evidence used to back up monotheistic beliefs.

Look at you!...with the big words!

Richard Dower

candy-gal1 wrote: »

FYP

:eek: is that your daily requirement?

candy-gal1

Richard Dower wrote: »

:eek: is that your daily requirement?

pretty much

:pac: