thecleverone wrote: » Attachment not found.
SeaFields wrote: » Perhaps someone might put in a call to Paul "Loose Canon" Gogerty then and see what he makes of the situation!
AudreyHepburn wrote: » I have to say I find the mounting hysteria over this quite amusing. Shock, horror, a grown man attends a friend's baby's christing and shares a few pints with his pals and maybe ends up a little worse for ware the next day. Honestly can anyone honestly tell me they've never done it? Don't be so snotty and hyprocritical. I mean come on, with the country in the state it's in surely there are more important things to worry about than how Brian Cowen chooses to spend his free time.
elviscostello wrote: » WTF is that bit about?!
AudreyHepburn wrote: » I mis-read something. Chill out.
mikom wrote: » What the hell is christing?
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Again It was meant to be christining but I simply mis-read something.
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Again It was meant to be christining christening but I simply mis-read something.
Luxie wrote: » But why did you specify a 'friend's baby's christening' in relation to all of this?
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Folks I made a mistake, what's the big deal?
mikom wrote: » You're in good company with Briano so.
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Meaning?
AudreyHepburn wrote: » I was reading another post here which said that the poster said he heard Cowen was at a lock in at a friends baby's christining. Folks I made a mistake, what's the big deal?
Luxie wrote: » I wasn't aware there was one!
littlefriend wrote: » I wonder is this the end of him?? The whole situation is really very depressing, not least because there doesn't seem to be a better alternative to Cowen..
WallyGUFC wrote: » You really cannot be serious? So what if he had a few drinks and a bit of craic, is he not allowed because he's Taoiseach? And for the record, I HATE FF but really this making international headlines is pathetic and shows where our priorities are.
mathie wrote: » No he's not allowed turn up for work slurring his words, making errors and coming across as drunk. He is in charge of this country. He made a decision to bail out the banks late one night two years ago. I wonder how sober he was then? "Our priorities"? That we're talking about our Taoiseach who shows no respect for the people by presenting himself in the fashion that he did?
mathie wrote: » No he's not allowed turn up for work slurring his words, making errors and coming across as drunk.
WallyGUFC wrote: » He made 2 errors that I noticed which he pretty much instantly corrected. How in the name of God did he come across as drunk? His voice was a bit patchy but he's a sh*te communicator at the best of times. And just out of curiosity, what would you have done that fateful night 2 years ago?
Jev/N wrote: » :pac: first of all, have you ever heard how he usually sounds. The same. also, questioning how sober he was when the decision was made to bail out the banks is a childish argument. Ooh he was drunk on Monday night and a bit rough the next day, that must mean that he was drunk when he made ever other big decision. Jesus, cop on.
mathie wrote: » It's childish to think that a man known for having problems with alcohol and who openly admitted that he'd need to 'up his game' when he became Taoiseach might have been drinking of an evening? Riiiiiiight.