larry1 wrote: » Just in.. played till 12.55am,Great gig.. Axl is a Legend!!
MrStuffins wrote: » he'd better turn up on stage on a f*cking Unicorn!
cherub rock wrote: » You're defending him?!!!
MrStuffins wrote: » Every person in that place paid €70, €90, whatever it was! He'd better turn up on time and put on a show! For that kinda money and considering he's so cheeky to use the GnR name, he'd better turn up on stage on a f*cking Unicorn!
Tallaght Saint wrote: » For about 50 people
Deleted User wrote: » tbh anyone who paid 70-90 euro to see what is in essence a tribute act is out of their mind. I was offered a ticket for 40 euro today and even then I wouldn't even consider going, thought for a second I was tempted imaging how good they were back in the day when it really was Guns N' Roses
basquille wrote: » I'd say the concern Darko was The O2's "apparent" curfew of 11pm.. .. plenty of people paid €75 to see them, and he arrived with the possibility of a 30 minute set. I can see why people were pissed off.. I wouldn't have bottled them (I'm not that type of person) but I can see why people were hugely angry and frustrated.
j10spades wrote: » My question is.. Why the fcuk are organisers selling glass bottles of beer at rock concerts? Surely there has to be a huge chance that something could happen. They are so strict outside but dont give a fcuk inside? once they get 6.50 a bottle lol??!?!??! nuts if you ask me!
Deleted User wrote: » I'm not so much defending him as pointing out how ludicrous it is that people are getting so upset over his actions. ffs, its Axl he's rarely on time and when he is he usually gives a dreadful performance. As for the walking offstage, well I will defend him for that. If a performer repeatedly warns the audience not to throw bottles at him and they continue to throw glass bottles at his head then he has every entitlement to walk off stage.Being a prick does not mean that it's okay for people to throw glass bottles at you.
parker kent wrote: » FYI they weren't glass bottles, just plastic bottles that look like the glass ones.
Deleted User wrote: » I agree, had I gone and paid the ticket price I would have been very angry and disappointed but at the same time Axl is known for repeatedly playing well past the curfew. No matter how big a prick Axl is there is absolutely no excuse for bottling a band. Why would he stage on stage if he has to spend the night dodging glass bottles?
zuutroy wrote: » No curfew in the O2, confirmed to me by a steward.
j10spades wrote: » they were glass bottles, Carlsberg ones
smelltheglove wrote: » Thousands of people paid 70 to see him and thousands of people probably knew to expect a late performance, a small group of people threw things, is it right to assume that the other few thousand lose their night out as a consequence, no its not. Security are in place for a reason, a rpofessional would ensure the people throwing items are lifted, those being aggressive are lifted and explain this to the crowd. This is not what happened, Axl walked off stage in protest of a limited number of peoples behaviour and when he did finally return after disppointed a large number of fans who left, he played what I hear to be a bitter performance to those who stayed to see him. To be honest booing is out of order really, ok hes made late boo for a minute and get on with it but the entire crowd should not pay for the minority.
basquille wrote: » Yep, no excuse for bottling a band.. .. but can we make an exception for Nickelback? :pac: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7F3O6WYfHQ
acquiescefc wrote: »