Jimdagym wrote: » -7 today now. Gone to 4 under for the tournie.
supersean1999 wrote: » the 22s are ok now lol needs two more good rounds tho
JerryHandbag wrote: » 64 WOW, lowest round of day by 3 shots after a quick glance at europeantour.com....2 more of those will do nicely
AGC wrote: » 64, great round. Jumped 80 places
Jimdagym wrote: » Still 4 lads tied with him or better.
Aidric wrote: » Only by a shot. Coelsarts shot a 65.
conno16 wrote: » i felt it was only fair to comment on his massive success this year and wish him another huge year in 2011 this guy is a gigantic prospect
Aidric wrote: » :eek::eek: An 11 on the par 3 15th.
Ginny007 wrote: » Usual crap an Irish guy wins a tournament and it is like you all que up to have a go at knocking him. I am living in Ireland for about 9 months now and i have to say you seem to spend all your time knocking each other over and putting your friends down. I think there is an important question to be asked here ??? The guy won your national championship and did so in fine style. Justin Rose was tipped for greatness but it took him years to claim his first victory. Give the guy time.
Ginny007 wrote: » Usual crap an Irish guy wins a tournament and it is like you all que up to have a go at knocking him.I am living in Ireland for about 9 months now and i have to say you seem to spend all your time knocking each other over and putting your friends down. I think there is an important question to be asked here ??? The guy won your national championship and did so in fine style. Justin Rose was tipped for greatness but it took him years to claim his first victory. Give the guy time.
durkadurka wrote: » WTF? Most people here want the guy to do well.
thegen wrote: » I think the most of is the point, you have muppets having a pop at hin given a chance on here, or Harrington for that matter!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gophur wrote: » BS. Harrington, for example, was top of the World, winning two Majors, then f**ked it all up by deciding to change things, and we all see the result. Everyone was delighted with his success, but nobody could understand why he changed everything. His PGA round, on that Sunday was incredible, 14 putts in the last 13 holes, one of the greatest finishing rounds in Major golf. Any criticism is based on failure to understand why he is where he is. He has failed to qualify for the Ryder Cup, something unthinkable two years ago. As for Lowry? He has a hell of a lot more support than you might think. Any perceived criticism is from a will for the lad to do well, not a wish for him to fail.
Gophur wrote: » BS. Harrington, for example, was top of the World, winning two Majors, then f**ked it all up by deciding to change things, and we all see the result. Everyone was delighted with his success, but nobody could understand why he changed everything. His PGA round, on that Sunday was incredible, 14 putts in the last 13 holes, one of the greatest finishing rounds in Major golf. Harringtons work ethic and search for perfection is following a very similar path to Nick Faldo's, Faldo too was an awful man for change and "tinkering" with his swing, and any body of my age will remember a kinda little "sump" he went into after his first 3 majors, (I say slump in " as a don't think Harrington is in one still won over $4 million and has a loada top tens) But he went on to win 3 more, when the hard work and tinkering paid off. I fail to see how Harrington "f**ked it all up" does he not still have his 3 majors?
neckedit wrote: » ............ I fail to see how Harrington "f**ked it all up" does he not still have his 3 majors?