Yag reuoY wrote: » I understand that. I'd be pretty happy if 66.6% of the news pertained to the rest of Ireland. It doesn't. :mad:
mike65 wrote: » RTE had no hand act or part in that. Or Father Ted (for the really slow)
Yag reuoY wrote: » My point is, no such crap should exist. :pac: I'd rather have NO such programming just for the sake of a decent news service. Not going to happen when RTE is controlled by the government.
Miss Lockhart wrote: » But if I watch the news from other countries (and I do, daily) I see a majority of reports from the capital city there too - seems normal to me. That's where the government and main centres of finance etc are, as well as quarter the population, so it is the location for lots of stories. Every day I see lots of reports from outside Dublin - if that's where the events happened.
Yag reuoY wrote: » Does anyone know the distribution of RTE employees depending on to their county of origin? IE No. of employees based on where they're from? I have a horrid feeling it's slightly Dublin-centric.
Yag reuoY wrote: » The BBC(and other local services in other countries) proviede a local news service. OR,TE News, 'Dourbblin'. :mad:
Miss Lockhart wrote: » Being from Dublin, I always thought they were targeting folk from the country, since 99% of what they show is of zero interest to me or anyone I know. Now you're saying country folk don't like that rubbish either and you think they're Dub-centric? Who exactly are they targeting so?! :pac:
genericguy wrote: » that's a shít, pointless question. oh, and i see what you did with your username, but if you look at it closely, you'll notice that you failed.
Yag reuoY wrote: » My user-name failures have been established many times already. The point is, RTE claims to be a national broadcaster, but this is absurd considering 90% of programming occurs within the confines of Dublin. Time to end this madness. :mad:
Kasabian wrote: » OP , did you mess up your username ? Sorry off topic :pac:
JaxxYChicK wrote: » Where are you getting this figure of 90%? Surely you can understand the logic of other posters here. Being that if a high percentage of the population live in one place, it stands to reason that a high percentage of the news coverage will be covered and based in said place.
Yag reuoY wrote: » The percentages are imbalanaced. When in my home country(The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) I am afforded news from my locality without having to suffer that of my captial. While I am prepared to admit this may not be possible for RTE, at the very least I'd expect somewhat of a balance when it comes to news on a national level, from a supposed national braodcaster. From the opinions expressed here, I guess this isn't necessary for you lot. :pac:
sock puppet wrote: » BBC has a regional news for places like Yorkshire and London which have populations of millions. What they don't do is provide a local news service for places like Somerset because it would be retarded.
JaxxYChicK wrote: » It's necessary when it constitutes news. So you're saying RTE should provide news coverage of something insignificant that happens in one of the other twenty-five counties at the expense of what, a slot that could have been given to a murder/shooting/high court ruling? If it's newsworthy it gets on the news, simple as. If you don't like it watch the news coverage from your own country.
JaxxYChicK wrote: » If it's newsworthy it gets on the news, simple as. .
Donkey Oaty wrote: » http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/somerset/hi/ There's a dedicated radio station as well (BBC Somerset) with lots of local news.
CorkMan wrote: » The Maori people of Western Samoa.