Cookie_Monster wrote: poorly maintained forestry and countryside.
saywhatyousee wrote: » yes granted i was only there for 5 day's i was in brussels and could not wait to get home.and according to all the graphs i am reading on the internet no belgium does not have a higher stantard of living
fakearms123 wrote: » but I was also in Vienna so I know that these two countries are better than Ireland from experience
fakearms123 wrote: » I was in Belguim for 8 days, sounds like you didnt enjoy your experience there for whatever reason, i could give many reasons why Belguim is better but im kind of lazy today, one thing I will say is that every major city should have an underground metro, Brussels has this, Dublin doesn't, plus crime and homeless people is almost non existent from my experience, but thats just one man's opinion, one sexy man
Fuzzy wrote: » Good man. How long did you live there for? From your experience there you understand how non-holiday things work, of course? Childcare, schools, healthcare, income tax, etc etc? Or are you just basing this on a weekend Ryanair holiday?
Wagon wrote: » We have a lot of problems. But we aren't dying on the street. And we get an education, food on the table, a health service (which i will concede that by western standards, is complete ****). and we have a better sense of humour than the rest of the world. And we're friendlier (exceptions to be made but let the **** stick to themselves and you'll be fine). And we don't work until we die either. We actually take a bit of time to enjoy life, which doesn't neccessarily mean the pub. We travel around and work and see places, can do sports and hobbies and when we DO go to the pub, we do it properly and have sessions and try and spend 50% of the time pissing ourselves laughing. Or at least that's what me and my friends do. I dont know about the rest of you miserable bastards. Ireland ain't perfect. The only ones who truly know that are the locals. But it's better then Bolivia, or Nigeria. and plenty of other kips where you don't need to be a native to know of their faults.
fakearms123 wrote: » And its these vital aspects of our country that we are in the top 20 best countries in the world :rolleyes:
artanevilla wrote: » Yes. The people make the country.
saywhatyousee wrote: » have you ever been to belgium?worst country in europe without a doubt
mikom wrote: » ♫ Kazakhstan greatest country in the world, All other countries are run by little girls. Kazakhstan number one exporter of potassium, all other countries have inferior potassium. Kazakhstan home of Tinshein swimming pool, it's length thirty meter and width six meter. Filtration system a marvel to behold. It remove 83 percent of human solid waste. Kazakhstan, Kazakhstan you very nice place, From Plains of Tarashek to northern fence of Jewtown. Kazakhstan friend of all except Uzbekistan, They very nosey people with bone in their brain. Kazakhstan industry best in the world, we invented toffee and trouser belt. Kazakhstan's prostitutes cleanest in the region, except of course Turkmenistan's. Kazakhstan, Kazakhstan you very nice place, From Plains of Tarashek to northern fence of Jewtown. Come grasp the might penis of our leader from junction with the testes to tip of its face! ♫
fakearms123 wrote: » are you saying that all Kenya people are pr*cks? If so then why are they not in the top 30 at least
artanevilla wrote: » Yes, that's exactly what I said.
artanevilla wrote: » The people make the country.
prinz wrote: » :pac: Perhaps you should go back and experience it a bit more than 5 days in Brussels tbh. Wouldn't even know where to start tbh... from brilliant public services, transport system, better opportunities for social life, better value and choice of food and drink,......and so on and so on.
fakearms123 wrote: » looking at the intial link the OP put up I saw no row that said "sound locals", im sure the people of the country being sound is a bonus but there is nice people everywhere you go, just like there is bad people
saywhatyousee wrote: » in the un human developent index ireland 5 belgium 17 (2009)
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/16/best-countries-in-the-world.html wrote: What’s more, our list represents a snapshot of how countries looked in 2008 and 2009 [...]
Procasinator wrote: » For income, Ireland is said to be 44.3K/capita. Is this accurate? Only useful statistics on earnings I can find quickly is http://www.cso.ie/releasespublications/documents/earnings/current/earnlabcosts.pdf, which gives average earnings (before tax) to be 716. Times by 55 weeks (obviously simplified) leads to much less than 44k. I would imagine Ireland is a little high in the list, as from the article: And I would imagine we dropped a few points in many categories between now and then as the recession came into full swing.
mathie wrote: » "Sure dares always someone worse off dan yourself." That kind of Irish attitude that we get from the Catholic church. Hit the bricks Catholicism!
andrew wrote: When they say income per capita, they mean national income, as in GDP (or perhaps GNP) per capita. That is, GDP (or GNP) divided by population.
prinz wrote: » Peculiarities in Ireland distort our positioning on these tables tbh.
rossie1977 wrote: » same reason people from the northern us states and canadians are moving and retiring to places like nevada and arizona, my uncle moved from nyc to southern texas because he hated the weather in new york in winter
saywhatyousee wrote: » same could be said about beligium.with those 400,000 highly paid E.U civil servants based in brussels flown in from across europe
Combined gross enrolment ratios do not reflect the quality of educational outcomes. Even when used to capture access to educationalopportunities, combined gross enrolment ratios can hide important differences among countries because of differences in the age range corresponding to a level of education and in the duration of education programmes. Grade repetition and dropout rates can also distort the data.