TalkieWalkie wrote: » Well I'm off to bed, I have had enough insults for today.
alastair wrote: » Nope. A debate requires deliberation from both sides - something that's notable by it's absence in your 'theory'.
TalkieWalkie wrote: » Hmmm, is it not a debate if one side think anothers theory is "stupid" ? Yup, it's still a debate.
alastair wrote: » Debate? Your 'theory' is a busted flush, and has been since you posted the first video. All that's left is the slow, slow, acknowledgment of the fact on your part - the car crash appeal is most engaging though.
TalkieWalkie wrote: » Okay, so you enjoy stupid debates and clowns at circuses, that's... uh nice.
alastair wrote: » It's the clowns at the circus that I enjoy the most.
TalkieWalkie wrote: » Is this how you usually finish a debate ? Or did you finish then restart ?
TalkieWalkie wrote: » Are you annoyed Mob ? What's with all the harsh words ? Take a deep breath and try calm down :rolleyes:increasingly stupid theory?your arguments are profoundly ridiculous
TalkieWalkie wrote: » ummm, they were supposed to be quoted. It's good to know the type of debate that keeps you interested, the self confessed "stupid" type lol
alastair wrote: » Actually - you're right - it's been consistently stupid from start to finish - and there's no doubt it's finished. :rolleyes:
alastair wrote: » That'd be the small propeller plane that carried truckloads of aircraft debris (including jet engines), as well as the body parts, and personal artifacts, and made it down from Boston in 45 minutes - that one? The one that no camera managed to capture despite the blanket coverage of the area?
TalkieWalkie wrote: » Don't really understand this so I'll wing it. When there is a large explosion in a large building, you'll be running, not examining a small barely/not visible propeller plane, probably behind/over a large cloud of smoke.
alastair wrote: » They're all in on it it tell you! Them and their invisible helicopters and visible fake planes.
TalkieWalkie wrote: » increasingly stupid theory?
TalkieWalkie wrote: » lol, Im guessing government employees did the DNA testing :rolleyes:
King Mob wrote: » Well considering the video you posted showed planes crashing maybe you should start there? And any photos of these planes dropping the wreckage? Any eyewitness reports? Anything other that your insistence to explain an increasingly stupid theory?
alastair wrote: » And your super-fast helicopters with their load from Boston - did any singe witness of the thousands there mention the lowering of debris onto the WTC site and surroundings?
alastair wrote: » http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/evidence/dailynews_halfvictimsidd.html
TalkieWalkie wrote: » Several news reporters sighted planes circling the buildings.
TalkieWalkie wrote: » Thats a silly question. Here is a better one. If there were no planes, what caused the impact damage to the building ? Answer : I have no idea.
TalkieWalkie wrote: » DID YOU FIND THEIR DODY PARTS ?
A total of 293 intact bodies were found, and recovery workers unearthed hundreds of parts each day. As time went on, the remains found were smaller and smaller - fragments of flesh, pieces of bone. The identification process moved quickly to microscopes and computers as forensic specialists used DNA, and several laboratories across the nation joined the undertaking.
DNA extractions were done on every one of the 19,906 remains, and 4,735 of those have been identified. As many as 200 remains have been linked to a single person. The 1,401 people identified include 45 of those aboard the hijacked planes - 33 from Flight 11, which struck the north tower, and 12 from Flight 175, which hit the south tower. Using DNA alone, 673 people were identified. Using dental records only, 187 were identified; fingerprints only, 71; photo identification, 16; miscellaneous X-rays, 45.
King Mob wrote: » So ignoring the fact your arguments are profoundly ridiculous, I'm morbidly curious what you think caused the explosions.
alastair wrote: » The helicopters that made it down from Boston in 45 minutes? And no-one noticed dropping anything? Those ones?
alastair wrote: » Yeah - you plant bits of planes YES, items belonging to the passengers YES, and bits of their bodies DID YOU FIND THEIR DODY PARTS ?, all transported from Boston IUNNO, and distributed in downtown NYC 45 minutes later YES. And you con hundreds of people into believing they saw an actual plane hit the building ABSOLUTELY. What's not plausible!? NOTHING
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)