Anan1 wrote: » So basically the State pays for people to learn to drive? No thanks - there are a million areas in education that i'm happy to fund, but learning to drive isn't one of them.
RoverJames wrote: » I've read most of it, back in the day (1999) I drove on my first provisional unaccompanied once I felt able for it. Most of us did and I would think most of the posters in this thread did too. However, now it appears it's being clamped down on. One of the folks posting in this thread posted that he was powersliding about in his BMW last winter on the way to work. ffs talk about double standards.
JayEnnis wrote: » And I bet you give out about the death toll :rolleyes:
Anan1 wrote: » What are you talking about?
Drummerboy08 wrote: » Its funny, the only time I was ever on the road with my provisional was in an instructors car on a lesson. I didnt even own my own car at the time. So it is possible to pass your test without doing it.
JayEnnis wrote: » Learning to drive should at least be subsidized by the state. Look at the mess we have on our hands now with such a high attrition rate on the roads. Learning to drive in Ireland is a fundamental. If you don't have a car you can't go anywhere. Its not as if we have a great public transport system or anything.
JayEnnis wrote: » So what I'm saying is that I bet you're one of the people who will give out about the death toll but when push comes to shove and their taxes are going to help lower it they say they don't want their taxes to pay for a solution.
Anan1 wrote: » IMO, learning to drive is a luxury. If you can't afford it then don't drive. I don't give out about the death toll which, incidentally, has been falling for a while. I do give out about driving standards, but the solution to that is enforcement, not state subsidised driving lessons.
JayEnnis wrote: » Learning to drive should at least be subsidized by the state.
JayEnnis wrote: » Ok lets change the situation. Would you be in favour tosubsidize lessons for pensioners living out in the country with no form of transport? If I didn't have a car I would be stuck out in the middle of nowhere all week as my parents leave for work at 6. Also I have my full license so I'm not just saying this because I'm on an LP.
JayEnnis wrote: » And you say you don't give out about the death toll? Although its falling I'm sure you wouldn't mind if it dropped drastically as more young people learned to drive properly.
Anan1 wrote: » No, I wouldn't. Why should the State pay because someone decides that they want to live in the middle of nowhere? People have to pass the test now. The only change would be that the State would pay for lessons, rather than the drivers themselves.
JayEnnis wrote: » Not everyone can afford to live in towns? And then there's council houses that are in the countryside. Not everyone chooses to live there. Until there's a good enough transport system I think its the governments responsibility to ensure everyone can travel. Its been done in the states and isn't at all that expensive.
laser2121 wrote: » hey i only got my car last week nd i drive alone on lp but not long distance just 3-4 km eg work school in sept u know nd i want to know has anione on boards been done for it ???
ABajaninCork wrote: » Maybe Jenna and all the other guys who thinks it's OK to drive on a permit unaccompanied should also read this....http://www.independent.ie/national-news/pain-of-husbands-death-is-neverending-for-me-2152338.html Sobering reading.
JayEnnis wrote: » Your point? That could have been anyone, drink or fatigued driving isn't restricted to learners so I fail to see where you are going with this.
Cookie_Monster wrote: » 1 don't drive unaccompanied 2 its only 3-4 km, cycle or walk 3 if you do drive I hope you get caught
Jenna69 wrote: » And just because some people are afraid to drive unaccompanied don't look down your noses at those of us who do, if the guards started enforcing the law tomorrow i'm sure none of us would be doing it so if you want to start somewhere start with that. I drove the whole way down the ballymun road yesterday with a garda van behind me and they never even looked my way.
Jenna69 wrote: » This type of statement really annoys me. Fit to be on the road with you????????????????? Who do you think you are????????????????? Anyone on a LP that i know (inlcuding myself) takes more care and caution on the roads because we are on a LP. And i only got my LP in April so it will be at least October before i can take my test so don't say get the test done, i will do my test when i feel ready to do it and not a second before. We all have to start somewhere so give us a chance! Like i said before full licence holders don't want LP holders on the road at all. Well tough!:p:p:p
nogoodnamesleft wrote: » Its amazing thats all you got from my previous post. So you recon that your qualified and experienced enough but you dont feel ready to sit the test but are willing to go on a public road and risk other peoples safety cause your ignorant. Correct you do have to start somewhere thats why you have the privilage of having a learner permit just to learn with restrictions its not a driving license.
VolvoMan wrote: » While I do fully acknoledge that it is illegal for someone to drive alone on a learner permit, I can't help thinking it's all very fine for people on here taking the higher moral ground, comfortable in the fact they have passed their test. For some people it is not possible to do the test due to a temporary lack of funds or sheer nervousness (I have first hand experience of the latter through a family member). I think for a person to become skilled at driving, they have to practice relying on their own perception skills rather than the person in the passenger seat beside them. They build greater confidence this way and if some system could be introduced that controls their time on the roads I feel it would be the perfect solution.
ferguson wrote: » well spotted. the words kettle, pot and black a*** come to mind for some reason