pickarooney wrote: » If you really had a great long-term memory you wouldn't need to revise in the week before exams
snuggles285 wrote: » ya never understood why people did that! how they did that at all and be able to sit an exam with a clear head at all!? I tended to give up the drink at least a month before the major exams the end of the year and it always came in my favour!
fluffyorganic1 wrote: » Must be an age thing as there is no way that I could manage to get up and go to labs and lectures if I was out the night before. The youngsters in my labs would be out till 4am the night before our Friday morning lab and stink of booze:eek:. Most of my lectures should have about 120 people in them but very rarely managed to get over 50 in them, mental. Early morning ones would usually have less than 30.... That said, the girls who had to resit the exams said that from what they could see, most of the class were repeating!!! Consequences are a biatch:)
MarcusFenix wrote: » +1 ^^^ I'm 22 and theres no bleedin way I could do any of that! Oh and the fact that you do so well first time round puts you in favor come decision time. Like if you need a certain % to get into a special post grad. Well thats what it's like in my anonymous college
IzzyWizzy wrote: » Considering that no study has ever been done, there is no general rule..
IzzyWizzy wrote: » It's really not that different to what I'm doing now, except I'll be paid much more and I won't have to have two other jobs on the side. There will be very little work to take home, if I'm productive during the day. I'll be working in a team, as I often do now and any required travel is compensated. I'll have weekends off, so I can go out on a Friday night and have a lie-in the next morning. I can go away for weekend breaks or go home for the weekend... I don't know why you have this rigid idea of what a 'serious job' entails and think overtime is normal. Every job is different and I've hardly ever had to do overtime beyond the odd hour here and there. What do you do?.[/
IzzyWizzy wrote: » Why unusual? As I've said, college is often much more than just the academic course.
prinz wrote: » Forgive me but your posts are steeped in insinuations about Mickey Mouse degrees, degree grade levels, etc.
Any mention of this being confined to your course alone?
In my experience, only the rich/lazy ones fit into that category. The rich ones could party while the rest of us worked and the lazy ones came out with bad degrees.
snuggles285 wrote: » You go to UCC or CIT?;)
MarcusFenix wrote: » CIT, the GOOD one!;) You cannot, and believe me i have tried, spell biscuit without CIT. You come out with either bisu, or bsui:eek:
snuggles285 wrote: » Ah cool. Went to ITT and UCC.:D
MarcusFenix wrote: » You mean TIT ya!?:D I'm so so sorry :rolleyes: Postgrad in UCC?
pickarooney wrote: » There is a certain category of student who simply knows how to absorb information quickly and retain it over a long period and how to seprate the genuinely useful information from the fluff. These people tend to do well in exams/assignments and have plenty of time for a social life. They're not lazy, just efficient.
Yes! thanks for the pun ha ha ha! Ya did my degree in IT Tralee and did a postgrad higher dipolma in UCC.
drkpower wrote: » Again, you almost completely omit a reference to any responsibilities and obligations of the job itself; that is the primary reason why it is easier to booze in college than it is in work, which was the primary focus of thos discussion. Your focus is on what you dont have to do outside of work, not on what you have to do in work. If your job has no significant responsibilities and obligations, I wouldnt consider it 'serious' (in the sense of how I used the word, in the context of this discussion). As you ask, I am a medical negligence and healthcare lawyer.
pickarooney wrote: » Circus Clown?
IzzyWizzy wrote: » I didn't go into the responsibilities of my college work either, but you didn't have a problem with that, did you?
IzzyWizzy wrote: » I told you that my tasks and responsibilities are largely the same. As for 'significant' responsibilities and obligations, that is completely subjective. All jobs are different, they all have their own responsibilities and obligations. Out of curiosity, what type of job would you say wasn't 'serious'?
Deus Ex Machina wrote: » I don't think that fees would completely solve the problem, there are many college students who sail through repeat after repeat at no personal cost due to bank rolling parents, but it may narrow down the complete wasters somewhat, and instill at least something approaching a sense of worth in the education process.