ejmaztec wrote: » Good slogan, but I can't figure out what cheese you're advertising.
alex73 wrote: » internet for user reviews, like on boards.ie or other blogs?? Companies have long tapped into them, do you honestly not think they also post their reviews (AKA ADVERTISING!).
John_Rambo wrote: » I work in advertising... etc... It works.
Cheap Thrills! wrote: » I have RTE 1 and 2 and mute the ad's and look away when they are on on the odd occasion I watch TV.
Dravokivich wrote: » lucky for you there's 1 born every second
John_Rambo wrote: » How much is your gym membership? That was the last project I worked on. Convincing people to pay through the nose to drive to a building to run on an electric moving footpath. Don't get me wrong, I don't see anything wrong with Gyms. But people do fall for advertising, even if they don't realise it. As I said, it worked. And yep, there is one born every day.
DonkeyStyle \o/ wrote: » Mmmhmm, the odd time I watch TV, I'm a channel-surfer, I can't believe people actually sit and stare at ads voluntarily. Whether you think it works or not, what they think they're doing is what I find a bit unsettling. There's no getting away from it though, even if you buy everything on DVD, you still have the product placements. Like Transporter 2, where you watch an entire film about an Audi car and the amazing physics-defying things it can do and the tough sexy people who drive it. :rolleyes: (shít film as well btw, don't see it) Unfortunately advertising standards are asleep at the wheel when it comes to stuff like this... they seem to have free reign to repeatedly expose you to whatever bullshít they want.
NothingMan wrote: » Depends. I get 99% of my food in Aldi and don't care what brand, So while I wouldn't rule out that I am subconsciously affected by ads, it certainly wouldn't be obvious at a glance to me or anyone else.
Cheap Thrills! wrote: » I don't see much advertising which obviously is a growing trend in people and infuriates maketers/advertisers. heheh yay! Suckers of satans c0ck that they are!
Cheap Thrills! wrote: » As for films, if I see a fancy car in a or someone drinking a can of branded cola, it makes no difference to me
Cheap Thrills! wrote: » I'm not going to want that car because I saw it in a film and I don't like cola.....I totally ignore it. Its easy! I just choose not to be obedient and easily led.
Cheap Thrills! wrote: » I don't see much advertising which obviously is a growing trend in people and infuriates maketers/advertisers.
InTheTrees wrote: » And anyone who says they arent are most likely being affected more than most others because they're in denial about its effects.
John_Rambo wrote: » So true. Those who know and admit they are are more likely to read, look, listen and understand the ad for what it is. They will also get better deals by looking at what is on sale for what price.
John_Rambo wrote: » They are also the ones that avail of the best promotions, Supervalu breaks for example. Holidays for half nothing. Literally massive money off holidays. Cheap thrills actually turns her head, lowers the station, edits out newspaper ads....! Ludicrous to be honest, nuts if you want good deals these days. Can't wait till she goes to buy a car, get lease on premises, buy a house, start a business whilst shunning all forms of advertising.
DonkeyStyle \o/ wrote: » It breaks the immersion for me, if I see some conspicuous product placement, my first thought is "oh, there's a product placement... nice... I wonder how much they paid to have that in the movie". The appearances of products/brands in films are never just happy accidents... as far as I'm concerned they might as well just stop the film and play an ad... the only difference is half the time you don't realize you're watching an ad.
DonkeyStyle \o/ wrote: » It's the things you don't choose though... and the shít they're trying to do is very creepy. I found this whole program very creepy yet fascinating:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/ (click 'Watch full program online') Again... whether it works or not... the cold, calculated, attempts at emotional manipulation depress me. I don't put it past any company to employ all the dirty tricks they can legally get away with... nor do I underestimate the amount of research they're basing these tactics on. I read a design book recently that covered cognitive dissonance and classical conditioning and when to use them in your advertising designs! So who are they doing this for? The small percentage of stupid, easily-led people that "aren't me"? Everyone thinks that, which is why nobody cares... it's beautiful in a way... using our own arrogance against us. And even if it is only dumb people who are influenced by advertising... does that make psychological manipulation fair? Why should someone have a bias towards one brand over another which isn't based on merit, but on something completely irrational? I find it dishonest, creepy and depressing.
DonkeyStyle \o/ wrote: » Don't worry, "social media" is already the latest marketing buzzword.
Cheap Thrills! wrote: » I'm on my second house, low mortgage, tracker.
Cheap Thrills! wrote: » Whats that then? Facebook and all that crap? I rarely use it....
Cheap Thrills! wrote: » I will never buy a new car because it's bad value and I've got a close family member in the trade who does that legwork for me
Dudess wrote: » I'd say most people think they're not affected, but they are subconsciously.
tony1kenobi wrote: » Excluding Aldi ads.