krudler wrote: » The limit per match would be better, least it would prevent boosters getting more than 4-5 kills out of it. I might try using it more now just to see what can be done with it.
breadmonkey wrote: » I don't think setting limits is the way to go - that'll just get messy and overcomplicated. Just get rid of it full stop.
Cereal Rapist wrote: » Have to disagree here. Putting on a limit would massively decrease boosting. I think 4/5 per game would be ideal. If you need anymore,well,you shouldn't be playing the game
breadmonkey wrote: » Seriously though, if you limit how many TIs you can use, then why not grenades, claymores, noobtubes, OMA uses etc?
Cereal Rapist wrote: » Finished the challenge in a few games.
Jev/N wrote: » 750 kills in "a few" games? Back on topic, I don't see why the TI can't be just taken out of non-objective based games, or FFA at least. It's quite handy if used right and in the right situations
Shammy wrote: » I hope they never get rid of it , i love catching people nuke boosting
MW2 CRAZY wrote: » to sort out the problem they need to put a cap on it how many u can use per game ect..
hightower1 wrote: » But wiminz love bad boys!
Dave147 wrote: » WTF is TATICAL INSERSION