RogerThis wrote: » When SaorSat is in full operation, will RTE still pay to be on the Sky system? It wouldn't make sense for €15 million of license payers to be going direct to Sky, when RTE have a viable alternative. Sky might carry then for free to keep the Irish customers.
endakenny wrote: » When Saorsat becomes operational, will it be possible to get the Irish terrestrial channels on Sky via "Other Channels"?
RogerThis wrote: » It wouldn't make sense for €15 million of license payers to be going direct to Sky,
tlaavtech wrote: » Think it might put RTE in a better position to strike a more favourable deal with Sky - RTE won't be so desperate.
Apogee wrote: » Theoretically, yes, but only with a share of technical jiggery pokery, and it wouldn't be the most user-friendly solution.
Manc-Red wrote: » I understand why RTE won't go the FTV Card route like ITV have done in the past & C4 HD is at the moment... But, This route their talking of going, with it being possibly on 13e or whatever other satellite.... - Is it going to save any money than say, stay on 28e and order a bulk-load of NDS cards for FTV Irish viewing thats encrypted in Videoguard?? I think this is pie in the Sky - Madness. I'm extremely surprised.
watty wrote: » If RTE was paying for a copy of Saorview on Sky that would be about €1.1M for EPGs excluding Radio (9 placements) €9M for FTV /Encryption (assuming 1/20th of charges to BBC) €3M to €8M for Transponder ( 28.2 is one of most expensive)Total RTE Cost about €12M a year, likely much more, perhaps €21M Cost of cards to Consumers 30 x 100,000 = €3M That's €12M to €20M a year leaving the state to Sky pockets. Only a 1/3rd is real costs, which is still €4M to €7M.
warlikedave wrote: » Its dependent - i seriously doubt rte will be able to go FTA on 28.2e (right restrictions for programming due to the wide beam on astra2 and also the carriage contract currently in place with sky) so it looks like it will be on the Ka Sat which means teh add channels option isnt one as the lads pointed out so we have to wait and see....:D It could happen that sky and rte keep thier services agrement in place so no FTA on 28.2 east and also have a Ka Sat ( 9 east ) FTA eire only beam for anyone not willing to use sky....
warlikedave wrote: » I It could happen that sky and rte keep thier services agrement in place so no FTA on 28.2 east and also have a Ka Sat ( 9 east ) FTA eire only beam for anyone not willing to use sky....
watty wrote: » Even if Sky did do FTV is would only be 5 channels and no HD. Not the full SaorTV lineup which will expand over next two years. Nor the extra radio channels.
RogerThis wrote: » Tony, from the quote from watty. Do you know what RTE are paying at the moment to be on Sky?
STB wrote: » Aye. Who is to say that there isnt a second mux in the mix.Satellite Question Question for Tony/Satellite installers. How easy is to have a 28.2E and 9E Ku and Ka on the one bracket on the one dish. Are you looking at a slimline3 type dish.
STB wrote: » How easy is to have a 28.2E and 9E Ku and Ka on the one bracket on the one dish. .
scruffy66 wrote: » If this is the solution for the 3% ,How is it going to look for RTE if more people around the country take up this SAT solution as a way to get a full FTA package ,through the one remote control If in the next 3 years 30% of the population switch to this free sat service which RTE will have to advertise ,nearing analogue switch off and only a small percentage go with the DTT service which only has RTE channels . WILL RTE not look a bit stupid if this service for the 3% becomes the more DOMINANT service out of the two.
Sponge Bob wrote: » Is Ka Sat supposed to deliver a higher power spot beam over Ireland Watty , out of interest. Your dish looks scarily small by our normal standards. I take your point on smaller satellite shadow areas (ie north side of mountains in the west) because of better elevation in the sky.