duffflash wrote: » I had to stop reading this tread as it was getting to distressing for me. Unfortunately there seems to be little or no regulation of this scheme. It will be exploited by employers regardless of whether they can afford to pay to employ someone or not, sure why would they when they can get a long list of highly qualified graduates for nothing. I’m not here to say that this is a bad scheme but that it is being run very badly. I think every graduate in the country would jump at the chance of going on this scheme if it offered any real chance of employment, but as long as employers are allowed to take people in and work for a year and let them go again and then take more people in to replace them only to do the same they will never create real paid positions again. Perhaps if after the first year the employer offered to pay a percentage of the wage in year two and again increased the percentage again in year tree it may work. But as it is it will be taken advantage of my companies that ( lets face it) are profit driven. I know there will be a que of people here waiting to tell me that people on the dole are freeloading and so on...... but the only advantage of this scheme at the minute is that our graduates have some work experience so they can better find work abroad and our economy will never recover if we again allow our best to leave the country. Please understand we are not looking for handouts here only a chance to build a life in our own country.
janice2 wrote: » hi all i was just reading this thread and wondering if anyone knows if you can qualify for the fas work placement programme and get payment from social welfare without actually being on it at present? i have received a job offer for mid august basically on the condition of being on this programme. i know that you can get on the programme without being on social welfare but this basically means you would be working for free. I would need to get social welfare to cover my travel expences, survive etc but my worry is that i wouldnt be able to get it on this programme without being on the register for three months- ie not long enough to start in august ? does anybody know anything about this system? i dont want to miss out on this job with a potential longer contract just because of a technicality like this! have been unemployed since feb this year but didnt apply for the dole because living at home and didnt think i would be entitled to it? any help is much appreciated, thanks!
milkybar kid wk wrote: » does the employer have to pay PRSI for the employee
jock101 wrote: » Being forced to Work for nothing, is that not called Slavery:eek:.
RichardAnd wrote: » No one is being forced onto the WPP.
carwash106 wrote: » Haha good point, no one is being forced onto it. Personally i was having an "easy" time of it at home when i couldnt find work but where would that leave me and the counrty for that matter, another person on the dole not bothering looking for work. For personal development reasons i would say to any graduate who cant find work and are on the dole, find a wpp1 with a company in your field and stick with it for your own sake. Try to ignore the feelings of lousiness that comes with the program because its not much more lousy than sitting at home when you want to be working.
RichardAnd wrote: » Sadly though, when I left college I found out how little a degree is worth and couldn't find a job.
alanajane wrote: » my husband was laid off some months ago but two weeks after he was let go his job was advertised on Fas as a WPP, so there was work there for him but the company couldnt or wouldnt pay him. not fair
mickeyk wrote: » This is against the rules of the program, they clearly state that nobody can have been made redundant from any of the positions advertised in the previous year so he should report that. I'm not sure how good they are at following up this sort of thing so there is every possibility that FAS don't know that somebody had been laid off and that this is the reason there is a vacancy for a WPP candidate, that employer should't be allowed get away with it.
danbohan wrote: » of course we should make the employer continuie to pay inflated and unrealistic wages until his company is bankrupt and then everybody be out of a job !
carwash106 wrote: » Thanks RichardAnd. It amazes me how little a degree is worth, not only to employers but to a graduate when they realise they really know nothing!!
Stark wrote: » And how are more efficient companies supposed to compete with inefficient companies that are propped up with free State labour? I've seen Supervalu advertising for checkout staff on WPP. How is the Tesco across the road (making up an example) meant to compete with that? Result: Tesco shuts down and the taxpayer is left holding the bill for Supervalu's payroll. It's better to let Supervalu go the wall and let Tesco take its place while paying its own way.
donkey balls wrote: » nope the employer gets someone to work for them for nothing as the person is getting paid from the dept of social welfare.
carwash106 wrote: » Interesting post. Lots of people made good points, really made me think. heres my experience.. im around a month into my graduate wpp1, im a recently graduated web developer working with a company now. So far im not really learning that much and seriously considering looking for a different placement. however i probably wont becausethe half of the day im sitting around im doing personal learning, im going online and practicing what i do. im lucky that way that my chosen profession there is a certain amount of self taught stuff you can do it still count as experience on paper and on your cv and ill stick the 9 month because i can learn on companies time. i was sitting around at home anyway doing nothing, living cheaply doesnt bother me as i have applied for the full dole(was getting 95) and applying for rent allowance( dont even know will i get that) Im not doing the whole coming in early and staying late thing because at the end of the day im working here for free, the reason i have so much time is because there isnt much work for me at all. At the end of the day a lot of companies abuse it but if you can find a way to take advantage of it( any advantage - building your cv etc) . It doesnt feel very nice to work without pay but i have no choice at the moment.
maninasia wrote: » You should get paid while getting experience, advertise your services online and work with a virtual team based in UK or overseas.
carwash106 wrote: » Hi What do you mean exactly? how would i go about doing that?
Deleted User wrote: » Its simply more state interference in the correction, propping up businesses by paying for employees only prolongs the necessary correction that recessions bring. It is disgusting by the way. Its less than minimum wage - why didnt they get rid of the minimum wage? Why didnt they reduce the dole across the board and those who take up the WPP1 scheme get paid more as an incentive to work. Anyone working under this scheme will feel undervalued when they work alongside people who are paid in full. Quite simply its damn hard to make ends meet when your on the dole and paying for transport to and from work. Its merely a govt incentive for the young to emigrate