ELFOYZER wrote: » Hey BS, that's what I took from the calculator/ predictor tool too, but then again it's only an estimate. If I had put my race times then into the calculator I would have predicted ~3:45 marathon when I ran the 3:29. Hard work, dedication, some weight loss and positive thinking - who know's what is possible?;)
bart simpson wrote: » aint no expert by any means... im kinda in the same boat as you, i did dcm last year in 3.29, and on my ballycotton time mc millian predicts for me a 3.10-3.15 marathon this year.....but the way i read it is that if i train as well as i could over 18 week period that is what my predicted time would be....not what my time would be if i ran a marathon the day i entered it in mc millian... ie to match a 10K 10M or half marthon time with your mc millian marathon prediction time you will need to do a hell of a lot of improving just to meet your predicted time well thats the way i saw it anyway, might be wrong, good luck with the training
ELFOYZER wrote: » I've been struggling with what should be 'Easy' and 'STEADY' pace. I calculated my easy and steady paces from the guide by working back from 6:50/mile,Recovery run :1 min to 1 min 30 slower than MP = 7:50 - 8:20Easy Run: 30 secs to 50 secs slower than MP = 7:20 - 7:40Steady Run: 15 - 30 sec slower than MP = 7:05 - 7:20 So far my pace as been as follows, EASY PACE = 7:45 to 8:00/ mile (Percieved Effort = 6/10) STEADY PACE= 7:15 - 7:20/mile (Percieved Effort = 7to8/10) I'm running a bit slower than what was outlined. I seem to be running Easy at Recovery pace and am just bordering on the Steady paced runs. I know that within the remaining 16 weeks or so my paces will drop. That said, I'm hoping that I'll improve enough over that period once I stay loose and injury free. McMillan predictor suggests that I am on for a 3:10 to 3:15 marathon, depending what result I put in. But I'm wondering is it possible to improve to sub 3 over an 18 week period??? Any comments or suggestions, please?
tisnotover wrote: » Whats your most recent race time ? did you use this in mcmillan ? One thing I would say, is that you shouldn't have to push pace on a steady run. You need your energy for other more demanding runs in the schedule like marathon paced miles or track-work. do you wear a heart-rate monitor ? As this will give you an idea of wheter your pushing too hard or not on these runs...
ELFOYZER wrote: » McMillan predictor suggests that I am on for a 3:10 to 3:15 marathon, depending what result I put in. But I'm wondering is it possible to improve to sub 3 over an 18 week period??? Any comments or suggestions, please?
ELFOYZER wrote: » I've been struggling with what should be 'Easy' and 'STEADY' pace. I calculated my easy and steady paces from the guide by working back from 6:50/mile,Recovery run :1 min to 1 min 30 slower than MP = 7:50 - 8:20Easy Run: 30 secs to 50 secs slower than MP = 7:20 - 7:40Steady Run: 15 - 30 sec slower than MP = 7:05 - 7:20 So far my pace as been as follows, EASY PACE = 7:45 to 8:00/ mile (Percieved Effort = 6/10) STEADY PACE= 7:15 - 7:20/mile (Percieved Effort = 7to8/10) QUOTE] Those paces seem about correct for a sub 3 marathon. And if youre doing an advanced program, then midweek runs will have some speedwork (10 x 100m or medium runs with some miles at half marathon pace). And some of your Sunday long runs will have a certain amount at marathon pace..
donothoponpop wrote: » Thanks for the reply. I followed P&D 70 miles (PMP 6:50) last time round, and indeed would have run the "easy" runs about 7:30-7:40. Now I'm running them 8:00-8:15, it certainly feels "too slow", but I think the idea is to compensate by running the hard sessions hard. I know there's no one-size-fits-all plan, but a common factor in a lot of 2:40-3:00 marathoners I know is their surprisingly "slow" easy runs.
smmoore79 wrote: » Im kinda new to this pacing thing myself so invested in PD advanced marathoning. Looking at your training, those 3 sessions look like hard sessions. That 10 miler at 8 15 pace seems a tad slow to me alright, id run that at 7 40. For me an easy session would be a recovery run of 4/5 miles at 8 minute pace. Midweek aerobic runs (runs of 8 to 10ish miles) are done at 7 40 pace and Sunday long runs are done at 7 25-30 pace. Sometimes my plan asks for some miles to be at marathon pace (6 40) and other runs at half marathon pace (6 mins). Not sure if your plan incorporates the same..
donothoponpop wrote: » Week 2 Summary 9 @ 7:50; 6 @ 7:15 + 8x100m strides; 10 miles@ 8:15|26| 70 Got Thurs session done early this morning- will do 4 easy tonight. Can I get a bit of guidance- the 10 easy were very easy- slower than I would have run easy miles at before. I read a lot about how a lot of marathoners need to run their hard sessions harder, and their easy sessions easier- certainly a lot of training logs of fast marathoners on the forum show them running easy miles at a very slow pace. I'd be interested in any comments, because this method is new to me (I'd be "no pain no gain" school previously).
ecoli wrote: » Be sensible about the mileage the ideal scenario was to build to this mileage before the program started but if you are not able to do this then take this into account when training and cut back the mileage a bit. Rushing the mileage can lead to injury. Better to do a little, alot, than do loads at the start and being forced to have time off due to injury. One option here is to hit the bike to make up the difference. This can develop aerobic capacity while keeping the injury risk down till your body adapts with the increase in mileage and will allow you to build the running miles slower
smmoore79 wrote: » Hi Ecoli, I do a fair bit of BHAA runs. These vary from 5km to 10km and are on every 2 weeks or so. For marathon training do you think it wise to drop these races due to them being short and replace them with the midweek tempo run that I would otherwise have done? or drop the tempo and race midweek? As i said before they are only every 2/3 weeks so wouldnt be replacing tempo runs every week....