donkey balls wrote: » It must be a year since they rolled this farce out judging by the original op posting date, Does anyone know of someone who did these schemes and if so did they end up getting a job or did the experience help in any way?:rolleyes:
donkey balls wrote: » Did anyone see the RTE news just now they are going to extend these schemes into schools and other public jobs.:eek:
omukazy wrote: » I recently took up the wpp programme but i feel **** working alongside people paid over 30 thousand a year... sometimes i dont even wanna wake up in the morning... get up at 6.30 am back at home at 6pm, and i spend 7euros on transport every day , to be honest theresnt any incentive and i might quit soon. I feel exploited.. :mad: i knw i went in there for experience but its not worth it esp for long 9months. Its easy to say one would work for free until you actually do it then u knw what its all about. I feel like a joke at work.
Deleted User wrote: » Its simply more state interference in the correction, propping up businesses by paying for employees only prolongs the necessary correction that recessions bring. It is disgusting by the way. Its less than minimum wage - why didnt they get rid of the minimum wage? Why didnt they reduce the dole across the board and those who take up the WPP1 scheme get paid more as an incentive to work. Anyone working under this scheme will feel undervalued when they work alongside people who are paid in full. Quite simply its damn hard to make ends meet when your on the dole and paying for transport to and from work. Its merely a govt incentive for the young to emigrate
carwash106 wrote: » Hi What do you mean exactly? how would i go about doing that?
maninasia wrote: » You should get paid while getting experience, advertise your services online and work with a virtual team based in UK or overseas.
carwash106 wrote: » Interesting post. Lots of people made good points, really made me think. heres my experience.. im around a month into my graduate wpp1, im a recently graduated web developer working with a company now. So far im not really learning that much and seriously considering looking for a different placement. however i probably wont becausethe half of the day im sitting around im doing personal learning, im going online and practicing what i do. im lucky that way that my chosen profession there is a certain amount of self taught stuff you can do it still count as experience on paper and on your cv and ill stick the 9 month because i can learn on companies time. i was sitting around at home anyway doing nothing, living cheaply doesnt bother me as i have applied for the full dole(was getting 95) and applying for rent allowance( dont even know will i get that) Im not doing the whole coming in early and staying late thing because at the end of the day im working here for free, the reason i have so much time is because there isnt much work for me at all. At the end of the day a lot of companies abuse it but if you can find a way to take advantage of it( any advantage - building your cv etc) . It doesnt feel very nice to work without pay but i have no choice at the moment.
donkey balls wrote: » nope the employer gets someone to work for them for nothing as the person is getting paid from the dept of social welfare.
Stark wrote: » And how are more efficient companies supposed to compete with inefficient companies that are propped up with free State labour? I've seen Supervalu advertising for checkout staff on WPP. How is the Tesco across the road (making up an example) meant to compete with that? Result: Tesco shuts down and the taxpayer is left holding the bill for Supervalu's payroll. It's better to let Supervalu go the wall and let Tesco take its place while paying its own way.
danbohan wrote: » of course we should make the employer continuie to pay inflated and unrealistic wages until his company is bankrupt and then everybody be out of a job !
carwash106 wrote: » Thanks RichardAnd. It amazes me how little a degree is worth, not only to employers but to a graduate when they realise they really know nothing!!
mickeyk wrote: » This is against the rules of the program, they clearly state that nobody can have been made redundant from any of the positions advertised in the previous year so he should report that. I'm not sure how good they are at following up this sort of thing so there is every possibility that FAS don't know that somebody had been laid off and that this is the reason there is a vacancy for a WPP candidate, that employer should't be allowed get away with it.
alanajane wrote: » my husband was laid off some months ago but two weeks after he was let go his job was advertised on Fas as a WPP, so there was work there for him but the company couldnt or wouldnt pay him. not fair
RichardAnd wrote: » Sadly though, when I left college I found out how little a degree is worth and couldn't find a job.
carwash106 wrote: » Haha good point, no one is being forced onto it. Personally i was having an "easy" time of it at home when i couldnt find work but where would that leave me and the counrty for that matter, another person on the dole not bothering looking for work. For personal development reasons i would say to any graduate who cant find work and are on the dole, find a wpp1 with a company in your field and stick with it for your own sake. Try to ignore the feelings of lousiness that comes with the program because its not much more lousy than sitting at home when you want to be working.
RichardAnd wrote: » No one is being forced onto the WPP.
jock101 wrote: » Being forced to Work for nothing, is that not called Slavery:eek:.
milkybar kid wk wrote: » does the employer have to pay PRSI for the employee
janice2 wrote: » hi all i was just reading this thread and wondering if anyone knows if you can qualify for the fas work placement programme and get payment from social welfare without actually being on it at present? i have received a job offer for mid august basically on the condition of being on this programme. i know that you can get on the programme without being on social welfare but this basically means you would be working for free. I would need to get social welfare to cover my travel expences, survive etc but my worry is that i wouldnt be able to get it on this programme without being on the register for three months- ie not long enough to start in august ? does anybody know anything about this system? i dont want to miss out on this job with a potential longer contract just because of a technicality like this! have been unemployed since feb this year but didnt apply for the dole because living at home and didnt think i would be entitled to it? any help is much appreciated, thanks!