moneyman wrote: » That was an extremely difficult paper for ordinary level. I'm a repeat, and I got a B1 last year. Was aiming for an A1 this year, but I can kiss that goodbye. I've done significantly worse in Paper 1 this year than last year. Hovering around the C mark right now, and I'm worse at Paper 2. Disgraceful paper. I can do every past paper inside out. Really horrible. Hopefully they'll have to change the marking scheme, although I see no way how I can even match my B1 from last year.
dannydfc wrote: » You might get an a2?:P Nah only joking , you seem to have done well, and perhaps you might of just lost a couple of marks, you'll get your a1 have some faith.;)
dannydfc wrote: » Ah okay thanks, might be slightly easier so.. Just if i can get 150 amrks though then i should be grand, that's half of the makrs in the exam, could be tough, possible though.
dannydfc wrote: » Did they? I only meant if the examiner was soft on the marks and if it was so close to 40 that she might pass ya...
Finical wrote: » I heard that 38% from that 2fm show yesterday. I really don't know if it's for both ordinary and higher levels or just one of them. It's just for maths though right? :pac:
lucybrown wrote: » they changed it to 38% like last week......handy init!!
UpTheSlashers wrote: » How is 38 a pass? Do you mean a D? I thought 40 was a D?
escalate wrote: » Okay I get it now,when I made -4t^2 positive the 96 changed to a negative but forgot to change the other 96 to a positive when I brought it over hence adding -96 and -96!What a silly mistake!Lol!
Finical wrote: » 228/600 will get you a pass. I'm fairly certain a pass in maths is 38%! I'm not sure though that theory might be for honours students only. ^^
lucybrown wrote: » i know same im such a weak pass maths student.......ive been doing pass since 1st year! its so unfair on us.......like all the people who dropped only last year or this year are fine for that paper not us...anyway good luck in paper 2 i hope its easier for us! :-(
Finical wrote: » Thanks, you too! I know yeah was bit tricky. I'm just a bit annoyed as I practiced through papers loads and even went through the speed, acceleration thing this morning but I have never seen it worded that way. Few new stuff altogether like?
jenjenxx wrote: » im devastated, im a very weak maths student and it wasnt fair on da people who just want to pass it to get in to college, how much marks do u need to pass? if paper 1 is really hard wud dey make paper 2 easier?
dannydfc wrote: » 240?:eek: I somehow thought it was 220, maybe 230 marks and they might still pass you, depends on the examiner?
Danger781 wrote: » I honestly liked the paper.. It was challenging without being insanely difficult A few parts were slightly tricky but most people should have been able to do them. I know quite a few are doing pass maths because they simply can't grasp maths, and they may have found understandably difficult. Good luck for Monday