Danger781 wrote: » From what I can remember you had pretty much the same things as me Joey (:
escalate wrote: » Question 7)c) was presented differently but I am now relieved as I also got the same answers.
JoeyBuddy wrote: » Yeah...it put speed there already. You didn't have to differentiate to get it. Was confusing. Think I got parts C (ii) and (iii) though, hopefully..
escalate wrote: » Yeah I'm also not sure if I got 7)c)i) right?How did you guys do it?
JoeyBuddy wrote: » Yeah I got those 2...didn't get a though. And for (iii) I just said 5, not t>5. I may lose a mark or two for that. Oh well.
Danger781 wrote: » (i) t=0 and t=10 (ii) 20 m/s/s (iii) t>5
MonTheBiffy wrote: » Thank you, I was getting a bit worried hopefully the 2 of us didn't foul it up the whole paper was a bit strange didn't feel right at all I still did ok (fingers crossed) on another note are you allowed take the question papers with you? I wrote all the answers i got on the question paper with the intention of giving them to my teacher to give me a general idea of my result but the examiner dude went and took it
Danger781 wrote: » I just held onto mine and walked off.. Most people had theirs taken from them :eek:
jenjenxx wrote: » im devastated, im a very weak maths student and it wasnt fair on da people who just want to pass it to get in to college, how much marks do u need to pass? if paper 1 is really hard wud dey make paper 2 easier?
Finical wrote: » That paper was a bit of a joke I thought. Some of the parts were pretty odd, even some of the B parts. Got a B2 last year wanted an A2 this time, looking unlikely now mind. Feck it!!! Going to go over 260/300 for paper 2, hopefully God will be with me.
escalate wrote: » 96+40t-4t^2=96 4t^2-40t-192=0 Divide by 4 t^2-10t-48=0 (t )(t )=0 What am I doing wrong?
Danger781 wrote: » I honestly liked the paper.. It was challenging without being insanely difficult A few parts were slightly tricky but most people should have been able to do them. I know quite a few are doing pass maths because they simply can't grasp maths, and they may have found understandably difficult. Good luck for Monday
dannydfc wrote: » 240?:eek: I somehow thought it was 220, maybe 230 marks and they might still pass you, depends on the examiner?
Finical wrote: » Thanks, you too! I know yeah was bit tricky. I'm just a bit annoyed as I practiced through papers loads and even went through the speed, acceleration thing this morning but I have never seen it worded that way. Few new stuff altogether like?
Finical wrote: » 228/600 will get you a pass. I'm fairly certain a pass in maths is 38%! I'm not sure though that theory might be for honours students only. ^^
lucybrown wrote: » i know same im such a weak pass maths student.......ive been doing pass since 1st year! its so unfair on us.......like all the people who dropped only last year or this year are fine for that paper not us...anyway good luck in paper 2 i hope its easier for us! :-(
escalate wrote: » Okay I get it now,when I made -4t^2 positive the 96 changed to a negative but forgot to change the other 96 to a positive when I brought it over hence adding -96 and -96!What a silly mistake!Lol!