Jake LeMotta wrote: » But I'm absolutely 110% that the above is true.
ejmaztec wrote: » Maths fail.
Vera Screeching Stress wrote: » Why do you want to believe this so hard? It's not going to happen, she hates you
Jake LeMotta wrote: » But I have a theory that, contrary to popular belief, chicks actually want to be f**ked more than dudes want to f**k them. The cuter the chick, the more she wants it.. I dunno, that may take more thinking about. But I'm absolutely 110% that the above is true.
Jake LeMotta wrote: » Yeah man. But I have a theory that, contrary to popular belief, chicks actually want to be f**ked more than dudes want to f**k them. The cuter the chick, the more she wants it..
Doyler92 wrote: » And no, this isn't the forum for good advice.
Armin_Tamzarian wrote: » Your ideas are intriguing to me. I wish to subscribe to your magazine.
Jake LeMotta wrote: » I'm not looking for advice. I'm giving advice. It's obvious some of you are sorely in need of it...
Dublin_Gunner wrote: » You left out the fact that they prefer no-strings-attached scenario's, love it in the rear, and swallow.Jake - as much as we'd all (as in the heterosexual male population) would absolutely love this to be true, I fear it just may not be.
Armin_Tamzarian wrote: » You need to talk to this guy
Jake LeMotta wrote: » That's the problem bro, it is true. It's just most guys don't recognize it and end up making bitches out of themselves.
candy-gal1 wrote: » i would say thats 100% true tbh lol
Dublin_Gunner wrote: » So eh, cute or so-so?