veryangryman wrote: » Clearly a touchy subject right now but... Is he seriously contemplating a revenge attack on the Israelis?!
General Zod wrote: » 10 PRINT #Mary Harney reference 20 ROFL 30 GOTO 10
ronnie3585 wrote: » He'll sit on Israel's face.
migozarad wrote: » Until it is confirmed there were no weapons aboard (pre-Israeli commandos boarding),I'm not hitching onto the anti-Isaeli/liberal leftist bandwagon..
migozarad wrote: » A bit of political grandstanding from BIFFO..can we categorically confirm there were no weapons being smuggled from that ship to Palestinian militants?Until it is confirmed there were no weapons aboard (pre-Israeli commandos boarding),I'm not hitching onto the anti-Isaeli/liberal leftist bandwagon..
kumate_champ07 wrote: » well even if there were weapons on board which I seriously doubt there was, the ships where in international waters and out of Israels duristiction, they had no right to board/ambush them
RayM wrote: » The widespread outrage towards Israel's latest crime cannot seriously be dismissed as merely "hitching onto the anti-Israeli/liberal leftist bandwagon". From what I've read, only those on the very far-right of the political spectrum are even attempting (quite badly) to defend Israel on this one - The type of propagandists whose gut instinct - upon learning that the IDF has committed an act of murder - is to pin the blame (or - better still - divert attention) elsewhere. At the very least, the Israeli Ambassador should be told to fuck off home.
Sonnenblumen wrote: » Perhaps you can give him a lift?
Sonnenblumen wrote: » How about an enquiry to uncover the reasons for such bad language? My head hurts trying to understand what it means!
RayM wrote: » Perhaps you can think of a less vacuous contribution.
Deleted User wrote: » A strongly worded letter is in order..
javaboy wrote: » Really? Your brain cannot overcome a couple of misspellings. That's gas. And conveniently allows you to evade countering any of the points made.
Degsy wrote: » Go on Cowan ya fat bollocks