Blitzkrieger wrote: » There might be a reason. I was thinking of joining the dark side and buying a car that runs on the fuel of the devil last year, so was looking at those myself. A friend of mine who owned one talked me out of it. Apparantly there's loads of problems with them. Not really sorted until post '05 really. Plus, talk about slow. 9 seconds 0-60! I believe Fred Flintstone's car had similar performance....
miss_shadow wrote: » who's leaving?
Cadyboo wrote: » I agree, or else just dont leave!:(:(
corkcomp wrote: » Stevexo ? hows your first day back?
miss_shadow wrote: » :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek: :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: What happened to your contract that started last Monday?
Blitzkrieger wrote: » 9 seconds 0-60! I believe Fred Flintstone's car had similar performance....
RoverJames wrote: » 9 seconds to 60 slow for a 2.0 diesel in a saloon, yeah
Webmonkey wrote: » Yeah I agree, it's slow, especially considering the K-Series 1.4 can get from 0 to 60 in 9.8 -10seconds Must rev it to **** but it's a rev happy engine so all is good!
RoverJames wrote: » I was being sarcastic I don't reckon 9 seconds to 60 in a saloon is slow for a 2.0 diesel to be honest. BTW, is your ZS a 1.4 ?
Webmonkey wrote: » I guess diesels are a whole different thing alright. I've no experience driving them. Ya it is unfort. Thats why I want to get rid of it. Changing engine would just cause trouble with insurance me thinks.
corkcomp wrote: » the 320's feel very fast, especially when the turbo kicks in.. its been couple of years since I drove anything petrol but I remember you need to rev them higher to get up to road speed. the diesel will pull away in 5th from 60kmph! give me a shout if you want to try mine anytime.. open insurance ftw:D
miss_shadow wrote: » grand actually, went to east village last night they had a BBQ on which was free and had a few pints! then went home watched desperate housewives and went to bed..im still in my PJs :cool: work tonight though,i don't mind.
stevexo wrote: » if i can find a job and somewhere to stay i wont go anywhere
Cadyboo wrote: » All my fingers n toes are crossed for you. But if you do go, we will be having boards meets wherever you are.;)
corkcomp wrote: » +1 good idea:D this day is really dragging.. enough work now I think:D
Cadyboo wrote: » God I hate mondays when Im on days!! just think, no work next monday:D
miss_shadow wrote: » Cool,so what is happening next weekend?
Cadyboo wrote: » What would you like to happen?? I was pushing for karaoke in Mardyke on fri, but I got blown out I think. Most want to go but not take part.
Purple Lemons wrote: » I think my kittens are a bit lacking upstairs, they're not very intelligent >.<
miss_shadow wrote: » I'd be up for that, if it's nice weather I might have a BBQ.. Other than that I don't have any other bright ideas!
kart wrote: » i assume ur talking about 60 kmph not 60 mph:P In this case it sounds ok... I had a really old car a while ago and i made it 0 to 100 kmph in 18 seconds at its best, lmao... my excuse is that the car was realllly old! i don't know what was 0 to 60 tho, never tried, i always only measured the 0 to 100
Webmonkey wrote: » Yep we talking 0 - 60mph. Or 0 - 100kph. I don't want to leave work because I don't want to run to the car in this rain
kart wrote: » dont leave then:) well in this case 0-60mph with 9 seconds is like super good..why u all saying it is slow? I mean... even at the racing competitions in airports the best '79 camaros get 8 seconds usually... So HOW did u guys get 9 seconds with ur usual cars ? Im gobsmacked...
deRanged wrote: » stupid weather.