miseeire wrote: » Once again there is a case of a seeming mass murder in the uk where apparently 3 sex workers(I do not like the term prostitutes)have been murdered.Now surely the time has come for those non-human murderers to be punished properly.They do not deserve to have a swift death,let them suffer like their victims.A SLOW PAINFUL DEATH.
FearDark wrote: » I agree, they should be made watch the Eurovision later.
Kasabian wrote: » Or read AH , tis becoming a slow painful grind lately. Maybe it's just me :rolleyes:
MagicMarker wrote: » I heard the guy who killed them was actually doing some kind of thesis on serial killers for college? I'm sure that's not entirely accurate but it's pretty fúcked up all the same!
Kasabian wrote: » When asked his name in court , he responded " the crossbow cannibal " .
FearDark wrote: » You're not wrong. They all seem do decend into Harney bashing, head shops and Eurovision topics these days...
Biggins wrote: » Maybe he's trying to add to his insanity defence! What was it he was studying again?
Kasabian wrote: » He was training to be a CSI , I think . He is innocent till proven guilty but they seem to have got their man.
Temple_Grandin wrote: » How many more poor women have to die before they regulate the sex industry to ensure safe working conditions?
dr.bollocko wrote: » To be fair regulating the sex industry might be a good step forward but it won't stop serial killers serial killing people.
Stinicker wrote: » Prostitutes in the UK really do get a hard time, ever since Jack the Ripper went on the rampage all those years ago, there have been numerous copycat killings of hookers.
Mike 1972 wrote: » The thing I find suprising about events like this is that The Daily Mail along with the rest of "respectable" society actually seems to care so much about Prostitures* being killed ?????? * Dont think there is anything pejoritive about the term unless the person using it intends there to be
dr.bollocko wrote: » Im a fan of the term prostitutes myself. Has the word tit in it for a start. Not being an advocate for state sponsored murder I wouldn't be pro- the slow painful death for criminals angle myself. The death penalty doesn't reduce crime at all. So really any move towards execution would just be a backward step. To what end? Revenge?
Del2005 wrote: » So it's better to spend thousands keeping then in jail for years, that isn't working either . Not that I know the answer.
Collie D wrote: » although I can't think of anything "respectable" about that particular "news"paper.
ArseLtd wrote: » This thread is too serious for ah. Those who live by the penis, die by the penis.
kingofthe3rdyrs wrote: » If you put them all in a big room to starve to death, relatively low expense and fear of a torturous death:):pac: