dayshah wrote: » While the road is fairly safe, but do we really want people doing 100km/h when approaching the 7 roundabouts on the road.
The speed limit approaching the roundabouts should be about 60km/h, so that would only leave short stretches for a higher speed limit. Also a 60km/h limit is needed near the turn off for the golf course and halting site.
Plastikman_eire wrote: » What part of my post strikes you as ridiculous?
nkay1985 wrote: » Well it was only one sentence so the whole thing. Of course it's ridiculous to suggest that the only reason there hasn't been a serious accident there is because the guards are doing speed checks. If you're taking that view, then how do you explain all the other roads around the entire city where there aren't speed checks but still aren't accidents? That is a good road with two lanes in each direction; the chances for an accident are very slim. I'd much rather have the guards, who are paid for by my tax, doing speed checks on roads that are actually dangerous.
Plastikman_eire wrote: » Due to the fact that the ORR is such a good road with two lanes, the tempation to speed on it is high. The cops regular presence on the it acts a deterant for when they arent actually policing it.
Do you think that road would have seen as few accidents as it has if drivers could speed along it with impunity, safe in the knowledge that they wouldnt get stopped?
I feel the speed limit should be increased on it, but I dont think the gardai pressence should be reduced.
Sully wrote: » Nobody suggested 100km/hr but at the same time it works fine in Kilkenny.. I think people have common enough sense not to hit a roundabout at 100km/hr - you generally slow below the speed limit on roundabouts anyway. Again, works in Kilkenny and similar layout. Turn of for the Golf Course is on the left "slow" lane so the faster traffic can pass out the driver intending to go slower because s/he wishes to take the next exit. Though, it should have an extra slip road in and out like a motorway. Similar with halting site.
dayshah wrote: » Fair enough about the slow lane for the turn offs, but we can't leave it to common sense for speed limits. Then there would be no speed limits at all. About the longest stretch without a roundabout is only 1km. Suppose we keep a 60km/h limit on the 100m approaching the roundabout, and it takes 100 metres after the roundabout to accelerate past 60km/h. That leaves a stretch of 800m. At 60km/h it would take 48 seconds to do 800m. At 80km/h, 36 seconds. Thats a 12 second difference. Someone using the road will at most pass 5 or 6 of these stretches (most less than 1km), meaning switching from 60km/h to 80km/h would save 60 seconds for someone using the road. Is it worth changing the signs for the sake of 60 seconds? Also if we allow 80km/h some people will do 100km/h
Creamsoda wrote: » It may just save 60 seconds but if your travelling that road to and from work every day that's 2 mins a day that's over 12hours a year. I'd rather have those extra 12 hours and no points on my licence.
gardatrafficop wrote: » one cant blame the gardai that you see doing these speed checks for where the speed checks are positioned we are assigned to do the checks in that location by highter comand.
gardatrafficop wrote: » one cant blame the gardai that you see doing these speed checks for where the speed checks are positioned we are assigned to do the checks in that location by highter Rank.
wellbutty wrote: » I'm not buying this "road was designed for 60km/h" story, if that's the case, does the fact that the average speed is 70 mean the surface will break up soon? The road around New Ross has a 100km/h speed limit, with left and right turns and no slip lanes. Why cant our road have 80? Because they think Waterford drivers are too stupid to brake when they see a roundabout? Quite simply it's a money-making initiative to implement a speed limit that will cater for safe access/egress to and from developments that may never take place.
dayshah wrote: » Does the road around New Ross have pedestrian crossings?
gscully wrote: » At what stage can we expect those in higher rank to position you at the top of the Folly to nab all the smart cnuts who continue to turn right (towards Otterans) well after the green light has come on for those on the Grange / Johns Hill road? Every day I sit in traffic there and marvel at the gall of them - some of them smiling away while looking in their rear-view mirrors. They'd just gotten away with it again. Next time, I'm putting my foot down on the 'G' of green and they can either stop, or feel my bull-bar! :mad::mad::mad:
Sully wrote: » Plus, using your line of thinking, a lot of our roads would be safe and accident free because of the regular speed checks we see. Clearly, thats not the case.
skodacb wrote: » I may get a rollicking off users on this, but I speed, we all speed who doesn't, does anyone do 30mph around town, no average is 35, same with the ORR, 40mph, ok yes some do stick to it, but most don't, my average is 50-60mph, the stupid ideas people come up with that you cant do that sort of speed on it, of course you can you can go a lot faster in fact, i wont mention figures but more than motorway speed on alot of it, fact of the matter is the road and its stupid limit was for money and nothing more, oh by the way if anyone has not noticed this, all the way goin from the B&Q out to join the city bypass its 40mph but coming in from the bypass to the roundabout of the old kilmeaden rd its 50mph, now isnt that strange and the same on the r680 going out of the city 50mph, but comin in from the sweep its 60mph....stupid country i think so....and one last thing too gatso van often down near the clock tower, if you ever see the indicators flash, you have been caught
gscully wrote: » You speed? Faster than motorway limits? In a SKODA? Pull the other one!
skodacb wrote: » Obviously a member of the old generation, and clearly not with the times at all:p
longshanks wrote: » they have one lane blocked between the tramore road and airport road roundabouts now. two cop cars and a cop bike, it seemed a bit much for checking tax and insurance.
honeybadger wrote: » are you a waterford traffic core garda by any chance garda traffic cop
gardatrafficop wrote: » i may or may not be