Pygmalion wrote: » Started reading The God Delusion. The man seems a lot less "extreme" than most people claim, I think they confuse overly direct (to the extent that you're pretty much an asshole) with being extreme.
Deleted User wrote: » I think it's quite mild. And very interesting. As Dawkins himself says, I think it's got to do with the way we seem to take Religion as some area logic just can't touch.
Craguls wrote: » It's more to do with the manner in which he debates and his total disregard for anyone else's opinion.
Craguls wrote: » It's more to do with the manner in which he debates and his total disregard for anyone else's opinion. His writing's rather good although he's a habit of taking established biological principles and putting twits on them to pass them off as his own. My biology tutor showed us a video where tore a group of creationists to shreds..
SligoBrewer wrote: » Sounds like he'd be a great Hist member tbh.
Craguls wrote: » Your **** off you hist **** profile picture induced many lols on my part.
Novella wrote: » I'm reading Pride and Prejudice. Have already read it a good few times, but I it. Also, The Journals of Sylvia Plath. This has been on-going for quite a while, I have to admit! It's a huge book and I think you have to be in the right mood to read it. Sometimes I find it really heavy and depressing, but it is amazing.
seriousfizz wrote: » I didn't know there was such a book! My gf is a big Plath fan, she's told me a bit about her. I'll be looking out for this one I love this thread, to be honest with yis! So many good books floating around :cool:
Novella wrote: » Yeah, it's a huge book. I can't remember where I bought it but it was pretty expensive. It's not so bad if you buy it online though Here it is : http://www.amazon.com/Journals-Sylvia-Plath-1950-1962/dp/0571205216/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1272979396&sr=1-4
Piste wrote: » I finished reading "Tghe Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists". I haven't read a book that made me laugh out loud as much in ages, it's pretty hilarious stuff. I started rereading Survivor by Chuck Palahniuk. I forget plots and details so easily so it's like reading it for the first time, with only a mild sense of Déja Vu.
Richard Cranium wrote: » I should probably re-read that myself some time. I read it a couple of years ago over the summer and wasn't impressed with it at all. I didn't see what all the fuss was about tbh.
Jay P wrote: » That's the exact same with me. I've been meaning to go back to it for ages.
Fad wrote: » Kinda curious as to what my demographic actually reads (if anything) I'm reading: All Families Are Psychotic-Douglas Coupland. and I have the following lined up: At Swim Two Birds-Flann O'Brien. Survivor-Chuck Palahnuik. and I have to scan through the "Bhagavad Gita" (Hare Krishna sacred text) for my religion project, which I really need to get done over Xmas
Novella wrote: » I really love Catcher in the Rye, it's one of my favourites. Atm, I'm reading The Importance of Being Earnest, by Oscar Wilde. I saw the play years ago, maybe when I was doing my Leaving Cert, I forget, and I loved it so when I saw the book on amazon, I bought it.
Shacklebolt wrote: » Tarry Flynn by Kavanagh. I also plan to finish Dantes Inferno shortly.
Insect Overlord wrote: » I'll be starting Angela's Ashes in a few days time, got through the first 3 chapters of Northern Lights very quickly last night.
Xx_emma_xX wrote: » I'm reading J.D Salinger - The Catcher In The Rye. I saw it today just dumped in some corner at a bookshop and said I'd see what all the hype is about. So far I'm not too impressed, to be honest, but it's early days yet.
Corkfeen wrote: » Sure i'll have a crack at War and Peace..... Will read some more Dickens and Dostoevsky for good measure. Have a big pile of recent enough books to go through too; Girl with the Dragon Tattoo etc....;)