FINGAL FAN wrote: » Reading this thread with interest . One thing I have to say to any posts in support of Eircom is - the Boards.ie Broadband forum is largely populated by a large crew of anti-Eircom types and your arguments ,however merited,will fall on deaf ears . Boards could just change this forum to the anti-Eircom forum to make its title more accurate .
bk wrote: » Hmm, it seems there is a flood of Eircom employees onto boards today :rolleyes:
bk wrote: » A reminder, in France you can get 100mb BB + unlimited phone calls + digital TV for just €30 per month.
hightower1 wrote: » but a couple million actual subscribers to broadband in IRL from all the ISP's. Not saying everyone else is happy but the vast majority are.
hightower1 wrote: » Someone put it beautifully here once..... "the vocal minority"..... just bear in mind that there are only a couple of thousand posters in the broadband forum but a couple million actual subscribers to broadband in IRL from all the ISP's. Not saying everyone else is happy but the vast majority are.
bealtine wrote: » Only in your dreams are there a "couple of million" subscribers and how do you know they are happy? Who elected you as their spokesman?
hightower1 wrote: » I think you'll find its not just Eircom who get bashed here but all ISP's tbh, broadband forum is mainly a whinge fest you'd be mistaken to believe most people in IRL are peeved off with their supply no matter whom their with. Someone put it beautifully here once..... "the vocal minority"..... just bear in mind that there are only a couple of thousand posters in the broadband forum but a couple million actual subscribers to broadband in IRL from all the ISP's. Not saying everyone else is happy but the vast majority are.
yomamasflavour wrote: » In fairness, most people in IRL are ignorant with regard to the quality of service, and the service itself provided by their isp. Proven by the litany of eircom 1111 2222 ssid wireless networks still in existance. Most are probably unaware of how poor the network is in this country compared to our European neighbours.
hightower1 wrote: » Thats irrelevant, the point I'm making is are they happy with their service? Not are they aware the Irish network infrastructure could be better compared to general EU standards........ and if they were not happy, one quarter of the country all wanting better all at once would have change brought in immediately, as I dont see any one million man march outside the dail I will stand by the fact that yes this here is the vocal minority.
bealtine wrote: » Again how do you know this? Have you done a poll, some research into this "fact"? How do you know that the vast majority are happy? Why are broadband issues only now coming to the attention of the press is it because everybody is so happy (including the journalists) so they are suddenly taking an interest in the subject.
Cryos wrote: » To play devils advocate on this one, What numbers do you have of people who are unhappy ?
bealtine wrote: » I have made no such claim:) I'm simply asking why somebody would assume that the everybody is "happy" with no evidence.
teddy b123 wrote: » So how does this €2 per GB work for us non NGB customers (the ones that are deep in the white patches of Munster) will we get charged €2 Per GB for all excess usage? will we get charged €2 Per GB to a max combined broadband bill of €49.99 or are we going to be charged at all?
therokerroar wrote: » Basically the same question I'd like to be answered too.
hightower1 wrote: » It needs no special research as its simple common sense beatline.....
Cryos wrote: » Well this is true, but then wouldnt i ask you (in the spirit of a dialogue such as this) if you think that the scale is tipped further on the one side ? or would you say that People are neither happy or unhappy about their service ?
yomamasflavour wrote: » I wouldn't have though the cap would be as big an issue. I mean this in the sense that Smart only has a 170GB cap, and upc has a 270GB cap - so Eircom's 250 is in that ballpark (at least it'd be better than the desperate 75GB:() I'd imagine the lack of speed (i.e vast majority wont get past 20Mb/s, and thats assuming they can even get the higher package) would be the real problem.
justatechy wrote: » Disclosure: I'm a networking professional currently employed by eircom. The above is rather disingenuous. What do you think the likelihood is of all users using all of their bandwidth simultaneously? No ISP in the world dimensions their core network by a rule like that. They would go bust in weeks (if they could get investment for such a ridiculous scheme in the first place).
All ISPs capacity manage their core networks to cope with peak demand. This demand is usually very predictable and very consistent, and can be forecast for up to a number of years in advance with reasonable accuracy. The bigger the ISP and larger the customer base, the more consistent and predictable the traffic on the core network.
ISPs make decisions on core capacity based on average bandwidth per user, plus overhead for growth, plus overhead for peak demands, plus overhead for resilience.
Depending on the network design and the ISP this will usually lead to somewhere between 40-70% peak link utilisation. Some taxpayer funded networks may run at lower utilisation but commercial ISPs need to make money from their investments...
While there are potential events that can lead to unusual sudden traffic levels (e.g. big news event, critical windows patch, virus/worm etc. ), these spikes are generally surprisingly small in relation to the total core network capacity and congestion if any often takes place at the source of the unusual traffic rather than in the ISP core.
They are much, much less likely to cause a customer impact than congestion at the access layer. It is this access layer congestion that the new NGB products are addressing. Believe me (or not, if you desire)... this is where you want improvement in capacity. This is also the layer that costs the most money (orders of magnitude more than the core) so it is not a cheap option to gain popularity. It is an expensive option, to deliver real improvements to real life DSL performance.
All I am saying is that I believe the NGB product will make a real and noticeable improvement to broadband performance for a majority of users. I'm surprised at the amount of negativity towards it and would recommend people wait for their upgrade and see how they find it.
this was going to be a short post...
tullie wrote: » Apologies if this is the wrong section to ask, but how do I find out what speed of connection my eircom line can support, having issues with the wireless speed or lack thereof.
Eoin_Sheehy wrote: » http://www.speedtest.net