rovert wrote: » Im not a provo
Head_Hunter wrote: » Not a second language and at 5/6 years old, they have enough to learn already without another difficult language forced upon them. Just my opinion, but I'm sure some people will agree.
AnonoBoy wrote: » Nil me in mo phrovo?
Abrasax wrote: » Chucky our law.
Knifey Spoony wrote: » Sure, isn't that all that the language is good for these days?:D
WesternNight wrote: » As long as people keep thinking like that, it is
we'llallhavetea wrote: » no and my mam and all her family are fluent. i'm a disgrace
WesternNight wrote: » I can only imagine that people's hatred of the language is a result of the way it's taught. Which is a shame, really. It's not a terrible language
Diabhal Beag wrote: » I am fluent in Irish. People should really take an interest in learning our own language or it will die out
creggy wrote: » I'm stuck between proficient and basic. My Irish teacher was pissed off all the time about the way he had to teach Irish. He would always rant about it randomly. Felt bad for him. He really does love the language, but he had to teach me and the rest of the class absolute shíte. You know there's a problem in the way it's taught, when students can speak a third language much better in the space of 5 years in comparsion to learning Irish for 14 years. It's a sad sight to see.
Vinta81 wrote: » I moved here when I was 12, so I never had too Only two wrods I know are Slan and Bonne (sp?) :pac:
rubadub wrote: » Would they feel disgraced if they were ignorant about something you studied?