28064212 wrote: » There are no jobs, so Fás put together a scheme to give people who didn't have experience a chance to get some. If you have some kind of solution to the jobs crisis, I'm sure Fás would love to hear it, but in the meantime, this is a practical program to increase job-seekers' employability for when there are jobs.
katkin wrote: » Well for a start why don't they scrap the WPPs and instead offer to keep providing social welfare to recipients who take up employment with businesses of any kind as long as the payment is matched by the employer. The scheme could be for one year minimum. If they are kept after that they might keep the subsidy for a total of two years, after which it is halved and hopefully the employer might be in a better position to keep them on and pay full wage. At least that's some incentive to employ people and provides people with a wage, which however small they would pay a little tax on and hopefully more in the future. The govt still has dole bill but they do anyway. Whatever they come up with it has to be better than an anti-jobs incentive for employers to get free workers.
mickeyk wrote: » I was speaking in theoretical terms here: thought that would be clear if you read the whole post, I am not trying to prove that experienced people are taking the jobs up, nor do I believe they are.
28064212 wrote: » Well for a start, many companies simply can't afford to take on a worker, even at €11,000 a year. And even if they can afford it, they will more likely save the money and just spread the work among their existing employees. And even if they don't do that, it will encourage them to let go employees so they can replace them with workers from this scheme. And even if all that wasn't true, it wouldn't matter a jot to the people who actually need experience. All jobs created from a scheme like that would be taken up by people with experience, because (from their point of view) twice the dole is better than just the dole, and (from the companies' point of view) they get a fully trained worker ready to go with no training needed. The only way for the WPP scheme to actually work for people with no experience is to make it completely unattractive for experienced people
katkin wrote: » Just a question, how did you gain experience to get into your line of work. Did you work your way up like most people, perhaps even offered to work for nothing for a while, did you benefit from an internship or work placement through college. I know I used some of these routes. So why are they not ok now. Why the need for this scheme? I think there is no need for it. One of the reasons it bugs me is the danger that it may result in employers chosing this route instead of taking on paid employees.
katkin wrote: » It bugs me also because it helps the government appear to be engaged with the issue of unemployment when they are really too busy protecting those they have always protected.
Deleted User wrote: » http://jobbank.fas.ie/servlet/Watis?SESS=10956_16&SERVICE=CRITERIUMBROWSE&TEMPLATE=WWW_JS_VAC_CRITERIUM_BROWSE.HTM&ROW=55&BACK=TEMPLATE%3DWWW_JS_VAC_CRITERIUM_OVERVIEW.HTM Area of Activity: ECCO Shoes, Retail Sales Consultant. Handling cash, stockroom duties, administration duties, selling shoes. Ecco shoes are hoping to take on 4 people to work in their shops for free on the non graduate internship. You dont need much experience to work in a shoe shop to be fair. How will this help our economy? How this wont increase unemployment I dont know
__________ wrote: » Where does it say they are looking for 4 people? Even still though, that kinda sh1t needs to be stopped. Although nothing will probably be done, I'm reporting that ad to fas.
Stark wrote: » **** like that represents a backdoor donation straight to Ecco. I'd be fairly certain that if the WPP program wasn't in place, Ecco would still be in a position to hire people and we could have 4 people off the dole or at the very least 4 students with a bit of extra cash to spend in the economy.
billybigunz wrote: » This **** really needs somebody in the media to do a devastating expose. Secretly record interviews, go over company financial records. It is sick beyond belief.
40.+ Canteen/Cleaning Assistant - (WPP2) 30 Limerick City JB538647 Area of Activity: Canteen Assistant - facilities for staff/ordering supplies and maintenance of canteen. Light cleaning duties. Elements of Experience Offered: Communication skills. Ordering supplies and accountability. Maintenance of staff canteen. Pride in work. Linking with visitors. Pastoral care of students. Person Specification: Canteen/cleaning assistant. Motivated. Flexible. Excellent communication skills. Excellent organisational skills. Applicants must supply suitable character references and be prepared to complete a Garda vetting application form.
Fred83 wrote: » there is a prime time team member on boards,hopefully they see this thread...
Driver - HGV/ C Licence Licence - WPP2 Description: Area of activity: Required for our Dublin based office. Pick up and delivery department. Elements of experience offered: You will gain a geographical knowledge of the City of Dublin and also the day to day activities of a truck/ commercial vehicles franchise. Person specification: We need someone who is experienced in driving buses, vans and HGV vehicles in order to pick up and deliver to clients. Full clean HGV licence required.
Deleted User wrote: » http://jobbank.fas.ie/servlet/Watis?SESS=9877_15&SERVICE=CRITERIUMBROWSE&TEMPLATE=WWW_JS_VAC_CRITERIUM_BROWSE.HTM&ROW=2&BACK=TEMPLATE%3DWWW_JS_VAC_CRITERIUM_OVERVIEW.HTM
Taxipete29 wrote: » As was said above, what person with that experience is going to do this?? This is an obvious scam to get free labour and not what the WPP was intended to do. I still believe in esscence its still a good programme, however those employers using the programme need to be monitored so that positions like above are not eligible.
mickeyk wrote: » I would be willing to bet that if somebody took on this job that they would get cash under the table at the end of the week, a clear attempt to abuse the scheme and defraud the taxpayer, FAS should not allow ads like this to be placed on their site. Nobody with that type of experience could possibly benefit from this position as it was intended, maybe if they were willing to train somebody with a regular B licence and pay for their lessons / test you could make a case for it.
toughbuttfair wrote: » Great news for our competitiveness. Now we can compete with China, India, and Vietnam. Labour costs haven't been this cheap in the western world since 1865 (parts of Amsterdam excepted). Who knows? We might even get those Dell jobs back.