ibarelycare wrote: » Unions. Trade unions should be made obsolete, they're not needed in this day and age and they're trying to hold the country to ransom.
DrumSteve wrote: » needs more poll...
alias141282 wrote: » [*]Despite all the rhetoric from Government their economic strategy is essentially to engage in a race to the bottom.
markpb wrote: » Based on what? During a recession, the price of things fall. Wages fall too. That's not a race to the bottom - it's an attempt to recover some form of competitiveness so we can make stuff, sell it abroad and generate money/jobs.
brianthebard wrote: » Wow, what a fair and balanced first post there Ads. Course the fact is that the banks and Government (local and national) actually did foster and push a bubble in this country, but don't let that get in the way of your drivel!
Fuhrer wrote: » Dont European Labour laws make Unions mostly obsolete anyway. In terms of stopping workers from being exploited I mean.
alias141282 wrote: » I see why people are giving out about unions but have people considering the following:
Deleted User wrote: » Reread the opening post, did I say I like the government? No.
Deleted User wrote: » The Trade Unions on the other hand should have every one of their offices firebombed and they're leaders hung.
brianthebard wrote: » You also absolved them of any blame for the present economic crisis, while calling for the death of all trade unionists, for which no reason was given. So you think that was fair and balanced do you?
speedboatchase wrote: » You're a moderator?
Deleted User wrote: » I'm refusing to get drawn into this. I hate both, I just thing the unions are the scummier of the two.
brianthebard wrote: » So? Drawn into this? You started this!
dvpower wrote: » I'm sure there are bad employers out there who would exploit workers, but its the exception, not the rule. Most workers these days are able to look out for their own interests (and have chosen not to join unions).
dvpower wrote: » Unions aren't interested in equality. They're primarily interested in the pay and conditions of their own members. This is often (as we can see in the passports office) at the expense of ordinary people. ).
dvpower wrote: » Maybe we should embrace reality. If we want to maintain our standards, we need to be more competitive. For the PS unions, the offer of no further cuts for cooperation on PS transformation is on the agenda. That's the alternative; so far they've chosen not to work for alternatives.
Deleted User wrote: » I meant I refuse to get drawn into a bitch fight.