thee glitz wrote: » Sounds rotten, wouldn't people just buy chocolate instead?
landsleaving wrote: » They were probably for kids who couldn't afford both chocolate and crisps. Didn't walkers do something along those lines as a special flavour a couple of years ago?
Steel Pump wrote: » Chocolate covered mini fcukin pretzels u dumb cnut
Steel Pump wrote: » Chocolate covered mini fcukin pretzels u dumb cunt - or where u thinkin of the pringle shaped chocalte pricks? I dont thin there was no crips in them, just chocolate
Steel Pump wrote: » Chocolate covered mini fcukin pretzels u dumb cnut - or where u thinkin of the pringle shaped chocalte pricks? I dont thin there was no crips in them, just chocolate
RichTea wrote: » Ha ha! There's always one who'll take it a step too far.
Steel Pump wrote: » THEY EXISTED, look em up if you don't believe me,
TPD wrote: » http://www.poetspot.com/forums/img.cgi?i=52365http://www.overpackaging.com/images/cadburys_Snaps.jpg Both very tasty.
Steel Pump wrote: » relax
rich1874 wrote: » I love buying a packet of king crisps and something like a twirl or a dairy milk, eating the crisps first then eating the chocalte straight after. Tastes mighty good. But no i've never heard of this, otherwise i certainly would of bought them. Perhaps we can invent them.
Steel Pump wrote: » Chocolate covered mini fcukin pretzels u dumb cunt