Schoolgirl Rachel was so drunk she fell unconscious during the party and believes her drinks were spiked by one of gate-crashers.
Thomas828 wrote: » Oddly enough, we haven't heard from Partyatmygaff on this thread.
BluesBerry wrote: » Have to agree with previous posters about the damage this is being blown all out of proportion, it just looks like clothes being thrown about and general mess why didnt the show the damage of the sword or the tv Must be a real slow news day :rolleyes:
Borneo Fnctn wrote: » Ah for fucck's sake she's 15! She wasn't spiked.
W.Shakes-Beer wrote: » i wonder at the party, did anyone jam his toothbrush up their arse and then put it back?
spudmonkey17 wrote: » Seems pretty weak to be honest, I mean who the hell microwaves a TV remote while trashing a house?
My husband and I are in our early 30's, from opposite ends of the country and different social backgrounds and we were both unfortunate enough to have attended parties like this in our teens.
Remi Brief Usher wrote: » That's what you get when you leave a 15 year old to look after your home... Parent fail yet again...
"We were out at a wedding and she was supposed to be staying with a friend and her mum and dad, but unknown to us she'd organised a party on Facebook and sneaked back
Minstrel27 wrote: » I call bull**** on the accuracy of that story. If all this damage was done then why wasn't it photographed? It is another step towards the build up of public outrage towards social networking sites.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Whats wrong with that?
Run_to_da_hills wrote: » Police are already constantly combing social networking sites seeking out potential "terrorists". BS articles like this one are invented to make the people believe that legislation such as IP tracking and censorship is necessary to curb this type of "antisocial" activity.