nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Head Shop Fire

Birneybau

http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0212/dublin.html

Im downwind and Im off my T!TS!

Find more posts tagged with

legal highs

terrorist

drugs

headshop

prohibition

Quick Links

Comments

rossie1977

you, your sex is on fire :P

rovert

tony231974 wrote: »

What ! Where will I get all my naughty things?

Valentines Day ruined

Morlar

xzanti wrote: »

It was attached to another shop which is of particular interest in this forum.. Come.. sit down

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055826178

Let's not fan the flames of the conspiracy theorists on this one.

The Master

Merged with head shop fire thread as they are both in the same building

Don't ask how I know that

ibarelycare

This is really sad. No matter about people's opinions on the head shops, that's someone's livelihood and people's jobs literally gone up in smoke.

AKA pat sheen

InKonspikuou2 wrote: »

A lot of other industries use the chemicals that go into these products so it's difficult to ban them without other reprecussions.

No, these chemicals aren't used anywhere else

The chemical composition will just be changed and then it would take another 3 plus months to try ban that one. And then the process repeats itself. It's unwinnable to try ban head shops.

If the synthetic cannabinoids, which are the biggest money spinners, are banned generically the way the UK did it it's hard to see what they could replace those with. Apparently the new legal smoking mixtures the UK headshops have been selling are crap. Harney has already said the new controls she is planning will be generic, you can bet that will be for both the smoking mixtures and the powders & pills. Another cut 'n' paste of UK law iow.

rovert

ibarelycare wrote: »

This is really sad. No matter about people's opinions on the head shops, that's someone's livelihood and people's jobs literally gone up in smoke.

Why are you assuming that there was no foul play here?

ibarelycare

rovert wrote: »

Why are you assuming that there was no foul play here?

You mean from the actual owners? I didn't say that, but more than one building was burned down. I'm presuming the same person doesn't own Utopia and Nirvana?

Buford T Justice

Right, well there's only one thing for it now.

Pagin Lieutenant Kane.... Paging Lieutenant Kane.........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjRG2530rwI

He'll sort this shit out, and catch the do-badders.... And all that in under 55 Minutes!

Booyakasha!

rovert

ibarelycare wrote: »

You mean from the actual owners? I didn't say that, but more than one building was burned down. I'm presuming the same person doesn't own Utopia and Nirvana?

Your point related to the head shop

Nichololas

rovert wrote: »

Why are you assuming that there was no foul play here?

At no point in his post does he assume that there was foul play.

Why are you assuming that 'foul play' means it was the employee's themselves who started the fire rather than the multitude of disgruntled members of the public, drug dealers and junkies which are all just as likely to have started it (assuming it was foul play, of course).

rovert

Nichololas wrote: »

Why are you assuming that 'foul play' means it was the employee's themselves who started the fire

What now?

ibarelycare

rovert wrote: »

Your point related to the head shop

Well the adult shop doesn't spark the same amount of controversy so that's why I didn't mention it, but I meant about both shops.

AKA pat sheen

Nichololas wrote: »

(assuming it was foul play, of course).

People living nearby said they heard a 'big bang' before the fire which caused them to flee their apartment. Sounds fairly suspicious.

rovert

ibarelycare wrote: »

Well the adult shop doesn't spark the same amount of controversy so that's why I didn't mention it, but I meant about both shops.

Still you said that someone's livelihood has gone up in smoke in reference to the head shop not the sex shop.

ibarelycare

rovert wrote: »

Still you said that someone's livelihood has gone up in smoke in reference to the head shop not the sex shop.

I meant both. I apolgise to you for the lack of clarity in my post.

Nichololas

rovert wrote: »

What now?

ibarelycare made the point that people's jobs and livelihoods have gone up in smoke. You responded asking why he was assuming there was no foul play. People's jobs and livelihoods have gone up in smoke regardless of whether there was foul play or not, so I don't know why you'd make that point unless you were assuming that it was their fault and therefore not worthy of sympathy ..

ibarelycare

Nichololas wrote: »

ibarelycare made the point that people's jobs and livelihoods have gone up in smoke. You responded asking why she was assuming there was no foul play. People's jobs and livelihoods have gone up in smoke regardless of whether there was foul play or not, so I don't know why you'd make that point unless you were assuming that it was their fault and therefore not worthy of sympathy ..

actually

rovert

ibarelycare wrote: »

I meant both. I apolgise to you for the lack of clarity in my post.

No harm done.

Nichololas wrote: »

ibarelycare made the point that people's jobs and livelihoods have gone up in smoke. You responded asking why he was assuming there was no foul play. People's jobs and livelihoods have gone up in smoke regardless of whether there was foul play or not, so I don't know why you'd make that point unless you were assuming that it was their fault and thereby not worthy of sympathy ..

I think youve badly got the wrong end of the stick here.

K-9

The Master wrote: »

Merged with head shop fire thread as they are both in the same building

Don't ask how I know that

Makes perfect sense.

Go to the sex shop first and then get "head".

Nichololas

rovert wrote: »

I think youve badly got the wrong end of the stick here.

Yes maybe I have. Perhaps you could be more clear in your posts?

WeleaseWoderick

Reckon I know what caused it....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFOqBN3EFS0

rovert

Nichololas wrote: »

Yes maybe I have. Perhaps you could be more clear in your posts?

Ok then....

stevenmu

Username-in-use wrote: »

Errr you think that if they weren't disguised as "bath salts" (etc) and removed the "NOT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION" they would be legal ?

Yes I do, even without those they still would not be illegal because there is simply no law against them (unless you know one that I'm not aware of).

psilocybe

AKA pat sheen wrote: »

People living nearby said they heard a 'big bang' before the fire which caused them to flee their apartment. Sounds fairly suspicious.

It was a pipe bomb. I know this for certain.

Corkfeen

Another possibility is that its psychopath Joe Duffy fans running amock.:D

My name is URL

Spilocyeb wrote: »

It was a pipe bomb. I know this for certain.

How do you know for certain?

Miguel_Sanchez

Spilocyeb wrote: »

It was a pipe bomb. I know this for certain.

In the other thread it was 'word on the street' but now you know for 'certain'. Did you bomb the shop?

psilocybe

My name is URL wrote: »

How do you know for certain?

Now you hardly expect me to answer that do you? Wait for the Garda investigation to finish.

Corkfeen

Someone should be calling gardai on spilock by sounds of things.