def wrote: » Should the legal drinking age be 18? If not , higher or lower? If it was 16 (for beer and so on ) like it is in some european countrys would this reduce violence on the streets and encourage responsible use?How so? If it was 20 (and 18 for spirits)would this encourage responsible use or reduce violence ?How so? Do you think a pub or the person behind the counter should be fined ?(for selling kids drink) Is fining more effective then revoking a permit? Do you think alcohol companys should be allowed to advertise?
DrumSteve wrote: » Are you writing a book? thats a lot of questions.... .
ejmaztec wrote: » Don't they teach anything in schools about this drink attitude problem, or do they just sweep it under the carpet like everything else that they don't want to talk about?
Briana Rhythmic Sidekick wrote: » To answer the op's question I think its over regulated. Off licenses closing at 10pm and pubs/night clubs having closing at 2:30 is ridiculous.
atavan-halen wrote: » Wasn't that to cut down on underage drinking? Pretty pointless as most teenagers have their drink by 8-9pm before going out.
ScumLord wrote: » Why should beer be given to younger people? You seem to be working under the incorrect assumption that beer is some sort of alcohol light. Just because it's got bubbles in it doesn't mean it's suitable for kids. Larger and cider get into your system rapidly, you'd almost be better off drinking spirits.
def wrote: » parents who do a bad job at raising there kids need something /someone to blame ,"if schools are supposed to be teaching our children... it must be their fault" every child on the first day of school should be given a list of what there parents should have /should soon teach them ,, parents should be your main educater ,not some person at the top of a room you go to everyday who shouts at you and tells you your not allowed go to the toilet etc this is not the type of authority figure kids need to learn this stuff from " if this guys such a failure ,should i do the oppisite to avoid becoming a failure in life?"
strobe wrote: » I see a few people saying this, we need more education. I'm all for education but would it make the slightest bit of difference at all? Is there a single 14 year old in the country that would come out of a school run education dealy on alcohol and say "wow, I didn't know that about alcohol. Really it can make make you do things you wouldn't normally do? It can be addictive?" ect. What exactly are we going to educate people about that they don't all already know? Everyone young and old knows, for example, it's not a good idea to drink loads of drink really quickly on a night out, they just choose to do it anyways.
Jay P wrote: » I can't really see it turning people off wanting to drink, but it might turn people off drinking as much as humanly possible. Maybe introducing kids to people with addiction problems might be one solution. I know that when I was in TY it made me think a lot more about alcohol when three men from AA came in to talk to us. Saying that is kind of like saying that there's no point educating kids about the dangers of unprotected sex because they already know all about sex. It doesn't really make sense.
DrumSteve wrote: » Are you writing a book? thats a lot of questions....
token56 wrote: » there are also problems associated with group mentalities that can build up regarding what is acceptable with drink and drunken behavior.
def wrote: » cool kid at break after learning about drink " wats dat tik takin bout ,gettin locked in rapid" other kids "but where can we get it ?" cool k " down the offo beside ***** ,no boder , giv it to any one , get a nagen do ,its well cheaper ,just down it" who do the kids pay more attention to? they say (teachers)do you not think teachers talk to each other?
token56 wrote: » It doesn't have to be just teaching that "alcohol can be bad and unhealthy, you can become addicted etc". They can be taught its ok to consume alcohol in moderation etc. They can also be taught about acceptable behavior when drunk, serious stuff. Maybe it wont make a difference, but I dont see much else being done in trying to help some of the drinking attitudes this country has and it is at least something which can be tried.
token56 wrote: » sorry I'm not exactly sure what the point being made is?
Overheal wrote: » I think another factor is Repurcussions or lack thereof. There is a serious air/underlying attitude in this country that the courts are not living up to their end of the bargain. Eddie ****ing Halvey - 7 months suspended sentence for drunk driving and Vehicular Manslaughter. Honestly what Deterrent is there to a Pleb to drink responsibly? Sweet F*ck All.
def wrote: » i think ,,, making the legal age for buying beer 16 and spirtits at 18/20 would send a strong message "educating" people that drinking is /should be about socialising not getting plastered ,and as a side effect take "kids" off streets ,they could go somewhere even if they couldnt afford to get drunk and if they misbehave they get kicked out .... thus giving them a reason to behave if they get told to move along in the streets ,,, thats it they just move up the road ,, once you drink in a pub a feild is a whole lot less appealing
Jay P wrote: » No, lowering the drinking age would do a whole lot of damage. I don't see how it could be seen as a good thing. It'd just encourage kids to drink more, and to start even younger.
Overheal wrote: » Tricky subject. One school of thought is that it reinforces the idea that Drinking is not something you need to Hide or be Ashamed of. And that in turn would lead to fewer closet alcoholics in Denial.
Jay P wrote: » Would you mind explaining how? I'm not trying to be argumentative, I just don't see how this would be the case.
RobbieTheRobber wrote: » Wasn't that (off-license closing) to try and reduce the binge drinking culture?
Overheal wrote: » Well theres also the Wine thing in france, which kids can do much younger, with dillution. But its part of the same theory set - Wine is part of the meal, shared with your family, in a very constructive setting.
aidan24326 wrote: » Nope. The government said at the time it was intended to try and cut down underage drinking. They never actually said how that would happen, because they haven't a clue of course. It wouldn't surprise me if it was really a deal with the publicans to help boost flagging pub trade (or something else like that at least).
steph1 wrote: » Yes I would be inclined to agree with you there but here in the West of Ireland the pub trade is dead at least during the week and its probably because of a few other factors e.g. getting bagged on the way to work which seems to be a common occurrence here. Go into any major supermarket and stocking up on the booze has become part of the weekly shopping trip and people stay at home and drink at home some of them alone which is going to cause its own problems. Think now this has backfired on them. I dont see any increases in people going to pubs and I know this as I am a taxi driver and this has led to a large decrease in my own business mid-week.