Toots* wrote: » It was a friday night from 8 til 10, then 10 til 5 on the Saturday. It wasn't too heavy on the religious stuff, and the priest who came in to chat to us was lovely. The family planning section was completely laughable though, a lot of misinformation given. I mean a 6th year biology student could have given more accurate info. All in all we did get some good out of it, but I definitely wouldn't be keen to do another!
How Strange wrote: » I'm so glad we're having a civil ceremony. I couldn't imagine having to sit through a such a idiotic course in this day and age. It's just a money racket. If it was so successful there'd be zero marital breakdown, separation or divorce.
victor1 wrote: » Do you "have" to attend one?
eoin wrote: » That's a bit of a stupid comment to make. They're hardly saying it's a guarantee of a successful marriage.
I was apprehensive of it myself, but we got more out of it than we thought we would.
How Strange wrote: » As I said, it's a money racket and it really is an outdated, old fashioned type of thing. Most couples live together before they get married and they don't tend to rush into marriage so they've encountered the usual problems that come with being part of a couple. .
How Strange wrote: » As I said, it's a money racket and it really is an outdated, old fashioned type of thing. Most couples live together before they get married and they don't tend to rush into marriage so they've encountered the usual problems that come with being part of a couple.
How Strange wrote: » It's a catholic church enforced course which they make money from. You don't have a choice about whether to attend it or not; if you want to get married in a church then you have to do it and from what I've read a lot of priests won't accept you doing the quickie, cheaper course. I'd like to think if you paid €250 and gave up your free time to attend a course that you would get something out of it and learn something otherwise it would be a money racket and a waste of time.
Saint_Mel wrote: » If your having a church wedding then the official line is you have to. Having said that though, I've known some priests who have let it slide for couples who havent attended the course.
How Strange wrote: » It's a catholic church enforced course which they make money from.
penexpers wrote: » "They" don't force you to do the Accord course (though I have heard of some priests insisting on Accord). You can do the course through any number of private operators. So "they" don't necessarily make any money from it. As for the fees, the courses are given by professional relationship counselors who need to be paid for the time. I would agree the fee seems quite high (especially when you consider the number of couples per course) but I guess wages are only one of the overheads involved in running these courses.
Toots* wrote: » The people who do the pre marriage seminars are not professional counsellors, they're married people who volunteer for it.
penexpers wrote: » We didn't do the Accord one - we did it elsewhere and it was given my professional counselors.
lizabbey7 wrote: » hi we were told by our priest that we can do any of the marriage courses has anyone attended the avalon course?
LoanShark wrote: » We didnt do it, and have been living together for three years,SO We know each other quite well by now..We were never pushed into by our priests So why would we do it??
eoin wrote: » Strangely enough, nearly all the people who think it's no use have never actually done one. The vast majority of married couples I know got more out of than they thought they would.
eoin wrote: » I think you've managed to misread every post I've made in this thread. I didn't say that it was an inconvenience that I didn't really mind going through, I said that it was actually a beneficial thing to do, even if it wasn't something that I might voluntarily do. Can you see the distinction I am making?